MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 000-23999
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-2373424 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
|
|
2300 Windy Ridge Parkway, Suite 700 |
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
30339 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (770) 955-7070
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
None
|
|
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No £
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes £ No þ
Note
Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant
required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from
their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No £
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K/A or any amendment to this Form 10-K/A. £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
£
Non-accelerated filer £
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the closing sales price of the Common Stock on June
30, 2004 as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market, was approximately $919,214,409. As of March 14,
2005, the Registrant had outstanding 29,591,324 shares of Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Registrants definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held
May 20, 2005 is incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K/A to the extent stated
herein.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (Form 10-K/A) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, initially filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 16, 2005 (Original Filing), reflects a restatement (Restatement) of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004. The
determination by management to restate those financial statements was made as a result of net
income in those years being overstated by a total of approximately $7.4 million, resulting
primarily from an error in the method of computing our research and development income tax credit
following a small acquisition in 1998 and for not providing the appropriate liability for sales
taxes in certain states (Restatement Items). Although it is possible to recover some, if not
all, of the lost tax credits through a retroactive relief request from the Internal Revenue Service
and some of the sales taxes from our customers who contractually agreed to be responsible for these
taxes, the amount of recovery cannot be estimated precisely and at this time collection is not considered
probable.
This Form 10-K/A only amends and restates Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A of Part II of the Original
Filing, and references to this Form 10-K have been revised to refer to this Form 10-K/A. Except
for the items described above, no other information in the Original Filing, including the exhibits
thereto, is amended hereby. The foregoing items have not been updated to reflect other events
occurring after the Original Filing or to modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent
events. In addition, Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain the
consent of our independent registered public accounting firm and currently dated certifications
from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. An updated consent of our independent registered public accounting firm
and the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are attached to
this Form 10-K/A as Exhibits 23.1, 31.3, 31.4, and 32.2.
This Form 10-K/A is being filed to reflect and effect the Restatement for the affected
periods, and as such, our previously issued consolidated financial statements and related financial
information for the years ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004 should no longer be
relied upon.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Annual Report may contain forward-looking
statements relating to Manhattan Associates, Inc. Prospective investors are cautioned that any
such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such
forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are delays in product
development, undetected software errors, competitive pressures, technical difficulties, market
acceptance, availability of technical personnel, changes in customer requirements and general
economic conditions. Additional factors are set forth in Safe Harbor Compliance Statement for
Forward-Looking Statements included as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to
reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating
results. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K is available through our Web site at www.manh.com.
-2-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Selected Consolidated Financial Data |
You should read the following selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with our
restated Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto and with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this Form 10-K/A. The statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, are derived from, and are
qualified by reference to, the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K/A.
The statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the balance sheet
data as of December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, are derived from the audited financial statements not
included herein, as adjusted for the Restatement Items. Historical results are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Statement of Income Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and hosting fees |
|
$ |
26,190 |
|
|
$ |
35,436 |
|
|
$ |
40,233 |
|
|
$ |
43,229 |
|
|
$ |
49,886 |
|
Services |
|
|
81,085 |
|
|
|
97,510 |
|
|
|
110,516 |
|
|
|
129,320 |
|
|
|
141,492 |
|
Hardware and other |
|
|
31,344 |
|
|
|
27,760 |
|
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
Recovery (allowance) relating to
bankrupt customer (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
138,619 |
|
|
|
156,378 |
|
|
|
175,721 |
|
|
|
196,814 |
|
|
|
214,919 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and hosting fees |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
Amortization of acquired
developed technology |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
34,299 |
|
|
|
42,372 |
|
|
|
46,611 |
|
|
|
54,218 |
|
|
|
65,853 |
|
Cost of hardware and other |
|
|
26,345 |
|
|
|
23,092 |
|
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
20,123 |
|
|
|
20,071 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
16,106 |
|
|
|
19,413 |
|
|
|
20,780 |
|
|
|
26,982 |
|
|
|
28,822 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
18,051 |
|
|
|
22,334 |
|
|
|
26,413 |
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
34,049 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
20,186 |
|
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
26,855 |
|
In-process research and
development and
acquisition-related charges |
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
117,474 |
|
|
|
134,092 |
|
|
|
140,136 |
|
|
|
166,320 |
|
|
|
183,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
21,145 |
|
|
|
22,286 |
|
|
|
35,585 |
|
|
|
30,494 |
|
|
|
31,609 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
2,746 |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
24,345 |
|
|
|
38,386 |
|
|
|
33,240 |
|
|
|
34,866 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,153 |
|
|
|
9,197 |
|
|
|
14,781 |
|
|
|
12,659 |
|
|
|
13,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,710 |
|
|
$ |
15,148 |
|
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted
net income per share |
|
|
30,453 |
|
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
30,451 |
|
|
|
30,882 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
67,667 |
|
|
$ |
104,189 |
|
|
$ |
121,857 |
|
|
$ |
155,403 |
|
|
$ |
172,656 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
67,933 |
|
|
|
97,926 |
|
|
|
119,790 |
|
|
|
154,858 |
|
|
|
133,628 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
153,540 |
|
|
|
182,179 |
|
|
|
221,864 |
|
|
|
266,608 |
|
|
|
290,239 |
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations and note payable |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
106,994 |
|
|
|
137,127 |
|
|
|
179,618 |
|
|
|
224,158 |
|
|
|
239,017 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts above have been adjusted to reflect the Restatement Items for all periods
presented. The restatement resulted from an error in the method of computing our research and
development income tax credit following a small acquisition in 1998 and for not providing the
appropriate liability for sales taxes in certain states. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details on the restatement. |
|
(2) |
|
In connection with a significant customer filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code, an allowance of $4.3 million was recorded to effectively defer
revenues arising in the fourth quarter of 2001 from the significant customer, but unpaid at
the time of the bankruptcy declaration. In the fourth quarter of 2002 and the second quarter
of 2003, $2.3 million and $0.8 million of the receivable was recovered, respectively. See
Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. |
-3-
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
All statements, trend analyses and other information contained in the following discussion
relative to markets for our products and trends in revenue, gross margins and anticipated expense
levels, as well as other statements including words such as anticipate, believe, plan,
estimate, expect, and intend and other similar expressions constitute forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks and
uncertainties, and our actual results of operations may differ materially from those contained in
the forward-looking statements.
The following managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations set forth in this Item 7 is restated to reflect the correction of errors that were
contained in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial information for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 as discussed below and in Note 2 of the restated
Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8. The following managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
restated Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto.
Business
We are a global leader in providing supply chain execution and optimization solutions.
Our integrated logistics solutions leverage a comprehensive set of applications that can be
implemented as an integrated whole or as individual point solutions to better manage the supply
chain. This platform for logistics is comprised of various applications including warehouse
management, transportation management, distributed order management, reverse logistics and trading
partner management along with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and performance management.
Our solution offering is comprised of software, services, and hardware.
Our warehouse management solutions (WMS) manage the processes that take place within
the distribution center, from receipt of goods to fulfillment of orders, and include applications
for optimizing labor and slotting. With our transportation management solutions (TMS), companies
can optimally procure, plan and execute transportation services across transportation modes, such
as air, ship and ground. Our distributed order management solution enables companies to balance
supply with demand and source goods to meet customer needs in a timely and cost effective manner.
With our reverse logistics management solutions, companies can effectively manage the returns
process and improve net asset recovery. Our trading partner management solutions (TPM) provide
Web-based synchronization between trading partners, improving communication and visibility across
the entire supply chain. Our RFID solutions offer a flexible, scalable and modular solution that
provide an integration and reporting platform between RFID chip readers and supply chain execution
and enterprise resource planning systems. Finally, our performance management applications include
event management, alerting and reporting
modules, which use analytic tools and alerting processes to monitor and proactively respond to
events within the supply chain cycle, analyze historical and operational data and generate reports.
In addition to our software solutions, we also offer a variety of services to enhance
the value we provide customers. Our offerings include design, configuration, implementation,
training, product assessment, customer support, hardware, consulting services and software
enhancement subscriptions.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that require application of
managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent
periods.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain
circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
and related footnotes. In preparing these financial statements, management has made estimates and
judgments relating to certain amounts included in the financial statements. As a result,
application of these accounting policies, could cause actual results to differ from these
estimates.
-4-
We have identified the following as our critical accounting policies:
Revenues and Revenue Recognition
Our revenue is derived from (i) Software and Hosting Fees, which consist of revenue from
the licensing and hosting of software and revenue from funded research and development efforts;
(ii) Services Revenue, which consist of fees from consulting, implementation and training services
(collectively, professional services), plus customer support services and software enhancement
subscriptions; and (iii) Hardware and Other Revenue, which consists of sales of hardware and
reimbursed project expenses.
Revenue recognition rules for software companies are very complex. We recognize software
fees in accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP
97-2), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect
to Certain Transactions (SOP 98-9). Although we follow very specific and detailed guidelines
in measuring revenue, the application of those guidelines requires judgment including: (i) whether
a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific objective
evidence of fair value exists for those elements; (ii) whether customizations or modifications of
the software are significant; and (iii) whether collection of the software fee is probable.
Additionally, we specifically evaluate any other elements in our license transactions, including
but not limited to options to purchase additional software at a future date, extended payment
terms, functionality commitments not delivered with the software and existing outstanding
receivable balances in making the determination of the amount and timing of revenue recognition.
Most of our software arrangements include professional services. Professional services
revenues are generally accounted for separately from the software license revenues because the
arrangements qualify as service transactions as defined by SOP 97-2. The most significant
factors considered in determining whether the revenue should be accounted for separately include
the nature of the services (i.e., consideration of whether the services are essential to the
functionality of the licensed product), degree of risk, availability of services from other
vendors and timing of payments. We provide our professional services under services agreements on
a time and material basis or based on a fixed-price and/or fixed-time arrangement. The revenues
from our time and material based professional consulting and implementation services are
recognized as the work is performed, provided that the customer has a contractual obligation to
pay, the fee is non-refundable and collection is probable. Delays in project implementation will
result in delays in revenue recognition. For our professional consulting services under
fixed-price and/or fixed-time arrangements, we recognize the related revenues using the
percentage-of-completion method, with progress-to-completion measured by using labor costs input
compared to estimated cost of completion. Revisions to the estimates are reflected in the period
in which changes become known. Project losses are provided for in their entirety in the period
they become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion. If we do not accurately
estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or if we do not manage our
projects properly within the planned periods of time, then future consulting margins on our
projects may be negatively affected or losses on existing contracts may need to be recognized.
Hardware revenue is generated from the resale of a variety of hardware products, developed
and manufactured by third parties, which are integrated with and complementary to our software
solutions. These products include computer equipment, radio frequency terminal networks,
RFID chip readers, bar code printers and scanners and other peripherals. We generally
purchase hardware from our vendors only after receiving an order from a customer, and revenue is
recognized upon shipment by the vendor to the customer.
Accounts Receivable
We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain an allowance
for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer
collection issues that we have identified. Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts
generally represent a sales allowance on services revenue, which are recorded to operations as a
reduction to services revenue. While such credit losses have historically been within our
expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to
experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. Our top five customers in
aggregate accounted for 16%, 16% and 14% of total revenue for each of the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in
2002, 2003 or 2004.
On January 22, 2002, a significant customer from 2001 filed for bankruptcy under Chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the filing, the uncertainties around the
bankruptcy proceedings and the
-5-
ultimate timing of payment, we recorded an allowance of $4.3 million
in 2001 to effectively defer revenues arising in the fourth quarter of 2001 from the significant
customer, but unpaid at the time of the bankruptcy declaration. We recorded a recovery of
approximately $2.3 million of the receivable in the fourth quarter of 2002. Upon receiving the
final cash settlement in June 2003, subsequent to the significant customer emerging from
bankruptcy, we recovered an additional $848,000 of the receivable during the second quarter of
2003. The recoveries were recorded as separate revenue line items in the Consolidated Statements
of Income and reductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
during the respective quarters.
Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), we do not amortize goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives. Our long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill are subject to annual
impairment tests, which require us to estimate the fair value of our business compared to the
carrying value. The impairment reviews require an analysis of future projections and assumptions
about our operating performance. Should such review indicate the assets are impaired, we would
record an expense for the impaired assets.
Annual tests or other future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators
exist and that our goodwill is impaired. For example, if we had reason to believe that our
recorded goodwill and intangible assets had become impaired due to decreases in the fair market
value of the underlying business, we would have to take a charge to income for that portion of
goodwill or intangible assets that we believed was impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could
have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. At
December 31, 2004, our goodwill balance was $32.5 million and our intangible assets with definite
lives balance was $8.3 million, net of accumulated amortization.
Income Taxes
We provide for the effect of income taxes on our financial position and results of
operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. Under this accounting pronouncement, income tax expense is recognized for the amount
of income taxes payable or refundable for the current year and for the change in net deferred tax
assets or liabilities resulting from events that are recorded for financial reporting purposes in a
different reporting period than recorded in the tax return. Management must make significant
assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine our current provision for income taxes and also
our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be recorded against our net
deferred tax asset. Our judgments, assumptions and estimates relative to the current provision for
income tax take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, allowable
deductions, projected tax credits and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by
foreign and domestic tax authorities. Changes in tax law or our interpretation of tax laws and the
resolution of current and future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for
income taxes in our financial position and results of operations. Our assumptions, judgments and
estimates relative to the value of our net deferred tax asset take into account predictions of the
amount and category of future taxable income. Actual operating results and the underlying amount
and category of income in future years could render our current assumptions, judgments and
estimates of recoverable net deferred taxes inaccurate, thus materially impacting our financial
position and results of operations.
Restatement of Financial Statements
In connection with the financial reporting close process for the year ended December 31,
2005, we became aware of certain tax accounting issues related to prior years and determined that a
restatement of our previously issued Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December
31, 2000 through December 31, 2004 (the Restatement Period) was necessary. As a result, we are
filing this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate our Consolidated Financial
Statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
The restatements are primarily the result of certain errors made in connection with the
calculation of our income tax credits and evaluation of sales tax expenses. The net income during
the Restatement Period was overstated by a total of approximately $7.4 million, resulting primarily
from an error in the method of computing its research and development income tax credit following a
small acquisition in 1998 and from not providing the appropriate liability for sales taxes in
certain states.
-6-
The following table summarizes the net impact of the restatement corrections for selected
balance sheet line items as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
Total Current |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current |
|
Retained |
|
Shareholders |
|
& Shareholders |
December 31, 2003 |
|
Assets |
|
Total Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Earnings |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
193,459 |
|
|
$ |
264,882 |
|
|
$ |
35,296 |
|
|
$ |
83,653 |
|
|
$ |
228,242 |
|
|
$ |
264,882 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
(6,932 |
) |
|
|
(4,084 |
) |
|
|
1,726 |
|
As restated |
|
$ |
196,360 |
|
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
$ |
41,502 |
|
|
$ |
76,721 |
|
|
$ |
224,158 |
|
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
Total Current |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current |
|
Retained |
|
Shareholders |
|
& Shareholders |
December 31, 2004 |
|
Assets |
|
Total Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Earnings |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
183,563 |
|
|
$ |
290,501 |
|
|
$ |
44,803 |
|
|
$ |
105,762 |
|
|
$ |
244,627 |
|
|
$ |
290,501 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
(7,407 |
) |
|
|
(5,610 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
184,245 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
|
$ |
50,617 |
|
|
$ |
98,355 |
|
|
$ |
239,017 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
The following table summarizes the net impact of the restatement corrections for selected
income statement line items for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings |
|
Earnings per |
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
Net Income |
|
per Share |
|
Share |
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
25,196 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings |
|
Earnings per |
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Net Income |
|
per Share |
|
Share |
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
21,845 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings |
|
Earnings per |
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Net Income |
|
per Share |
|
Share |
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
22,109 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
For further details on the restatement adjustments, see Note 2 to the restated
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Pursuant to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standards and following a further
review and examination of the Companys internal controls, the management has determined that a
material weakness existed in the Companys internal controls with respect to processes surrounding
the calculation of the income tax provision and the accrual for sales
taxes. See Item 9A Controls
and Procedures Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting for
further information regarding our reassessment of material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting.
-7-
Results of Operations
Overview
Over the past several years, our primary goal has been and continues to be to expand of our
position as a leading provider of supply chain execution and optimization solutions by delivering
integrated, modular solutions to our customers. With the addition and integration of new products
resulting from the acquisitions completed during 2002, 2003 and 2004, as discussed above, along
with the synchronized release of new versions of our product suite with enhanced functionality, we
were able to accomplish continued revenue growth.
During 2004, we continued to experience the effects of a weak spending environment for
information technology in the United States and Europe, in the form of delayed and cancelled buying
decisions by customers for our software, services and hardware, deferrals by customers of service
engagements previously scheduled and pressure by our customers and competitors to discount our
offerings. We believe that a deterioration in the current business climates or continued delay in
capital spending within the United States and/or other geographic regions in which we operate,
principally the United Kingdom and continental Europe, could have a material adverse impact on our
future operations.
In 2005, we plan to continue to enhance our solutions, expand globally and further develop our
sales and marketing, including strategic alliances and indirect sales channels. Our success could
be limited by several factors, including spending on information technology, the timely release of
quality new products and releases, continued market acceptance of our solutions and the
introduction of new products by existing or new competitors.
On December 31, 2002, we acquired certain assets of Logistics.com, Inc. for a cash payment of
approximately $21.3 million. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting; thus the results of operations reflect the incremental effect beginning January 1,
2003. $1.5 million of the purchase price was allocated to acquired in-process research and
development. Values assigned to the acquired in-process research and development (IPRD) were
determined using the income approach. To determine the value of the IPRD, we considered, among
other factors, the state of development of each project, the time and costs required to complete
each project, expected income and associated risks, which included the inherent difficulties and
uncertainties in completing the project and achieving technological feasibility and risks related
to the viability of and potential changes in future target markets. This analysis resulted in
amounts assigned to IPRD for projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility and do not
have alternative future uses.
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2002 to 2003 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2003 to 2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Software and hosting fees |
|
$ |
40,233 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
43,229 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
49,886 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
Services |
|
|
110,516 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
129,320 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
141,492 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
Hardware and other |
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
23,541 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Recovery relating to bankrupt customer |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
175,721 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
196,814 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
214,919 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Percentage is not meaningful |
Our revenue consists of fees generated from the licensing and hosting of software; fees
from professional services, customer support services and software enhancement subscriptions; and
sales of complementary radio frequency and computer equipment, which are considered non-strategic.
We believe our revenue growth in the last two years is attributable to several factors, including,
among others, increased sales of our expanded product suite, geographic expansion, our market
leadership positions as to breadth of product offerings and financial stability and a compelling
return on investment proposition for our customers.
-8-
Software and hosting fees. The increase in software and hosting fees from 2002 to 2003
was due to sales of newer products, hosting fees and funded development, relating primarily to the
TMS products obtained through the acquisition of Logistics.com. Sales of our solution groups other
than our warehouse management solution group increased by $10.9 million, or 166%, from 2002 to
2003, while sales of our warehouse management solution group decreased by $7.9 million, or 24%,
from 2002 to 2003. The increase from 2003 to 2004 was attributable to an increase of $2.8 million,
or 11%, in sales of our warehouse management solution group and an increase of $3.9 million, or
22%, for all other solution groups. Sales outside of North America also impacted the increase from
2003 to 2004 as sales increased from 18% of total software and hosting fees in 2003 to 28% in 2004.
Services revenue. The increases in services revenue from 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 were
principally due to: (i) increases of 14% and 13% in 2003 and 2004, respectively, in the number of
active engagements required to implement the increased amount of software sold and to upgrade
existing customers to more current versions of our offerings; and (ii) renewals of customer support
services and software enhancement subscription agreements on a growing installed base. Revenue
from software enhancement subscription agreements increased by 30% and 20% during 2003 and 2004,
respectively. During the economic downturn, we have experienced some pricing pressures with regard
to our services. We believe that the pricing pressures are attributable to global macro-economic
conditions and competitive pressures. Our services revenue growth has been and will likely
continue to be affected by the mix of products sold. The individual engagements involving our
newer products, including TMS, RFID and TPM, typically require less implementation services;
however, the number of engagements continue to grow.
Hardware and other. Sales of hardware are non-strategic and largely dependent upon
customer-specific desires. Sales of hardware decreased $0.4 million, or 2%, from approximately
$17.3 million in 2002 to approximately $16.9 million in 2003 and decreased an additional $0.4
million, or 2%, to approximately $16.5 million in 2004. The decreases in hardware sales from 2002
to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 are attributable to customers desires in the current macro-economic
environment to buy hardware from other suppliers offering greater discounts, combined with
increased sales of our
optimization and transportation products, which require less hardware than our core warehouse
management products. As described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses are required to be classified as revenue and are included
in hardware and other revenue. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, reimbursements by customers for
out-of-pocket expenses were approximately $5.4 million, $6.5 million and $7.0 million,
respectively.
Recovery relating to bankrupt customer. On January 22, 2002, a significant customer for 2001
filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the
filing, the uncertainties around the bankruptcy proceedings and the ultimate timing of payment, we
recorded an allowance of $4.3 million in 2001 to effectively defer revenues arising in the fourth
quarter of 2001 from the significant customer, but unpaid at the time of the bankruptcy
declaration. We recorded a recovery of approximately $2.3 million of the receivable in the fourth
quarter of 2002. Upon receiving the final cash settlement in June 2003, subsequent to the
significant customer emerging from bankruptcy, we recovered an additional $848,000 of the
receivable during the second quarter of 2003. The recoveries were recorded as separate revenue
line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income and reductions to the allowance for doubtful
accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets during the respective quarters.
-9-
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2002 |
|
2002 to 2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 to 2004 |
|
2004 |
Cost of software and hosting fees |
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
|
132 |
% |
|
$ |
4,470 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
$ |
4,085 |
|
Percentage of software and hosting fees |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Amortization of acquired developed technology |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
2,079 |
|
Percentage of software and hosting fees |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
46,611 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
54,218 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
65,853 |
|
Percentage of services revenues |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
Cost of hardware and other |
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
20,123 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
20,071 |
|
Percentage of hardware and other revenues |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
Research and development |
|
|
20,780 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
26,982 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
28,822 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
26,413 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
34,049 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
General and administrative (restated) |
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
26,855 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
427 |
% |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1,496 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
In-process research and development
and acquisition-related charges |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Percentage is not meaningful |
Cost of Software and Hosting Fees. Cost of software and hosting fees consists of the
costs associated with software reproduction; hosting services; funded development; media, packaging
and delivery, documentation and other related costs; royalties on third-party software sold with or
as part of our products; and the amortization of capitalized research and development costs. The
increase in cost of software fees, as a percent of software and hosting fees and in absolute
dollars, in 2003 is principally attributable to the costs associated with hosting certain of our
software solutions, which was approximately $1.7 million in 2003. As discussed above, we did not
offer hosting services during 2002. In addition, sales of our open systems products as a
percentage of total revenue from all products sold, increased from approximately 50% in 2002 to
approximately 80% in 2003 which resulted in higher royalties paid to third parties during 2003. The
decrease in cost of software fees, as a percentage of software and hosting fees and in absolute
dollars, in 2004 is attributable to lower telecommunication costs associated with hosting certain
of our software solutions and lower amortization expense. There was approximately $300,000 of
amortization expense in 2003 associated with capitalized development costs, which were fully
amortized by the end of 2003.
Amortization of Acquired Developed Technology. Amortization of acquired developed technology
increased from $1.5 million in 2002 to $2.0 million in 2003 to $2.1 million in 2004. The increases
were the result of the acquisitions of Logistics.com in December 2002, ReturnCentral in June 2003,
Streamsoft in October 2003 and Avere in January 2004.
Cost of Services. Cost of services consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related
expenses of employees dedicated to professional and technical services and customer support
services. The increases in cost of services from 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 were principally
due to increases in salary-related costs resulting from: (i) increases of 11% and 19%,
respectively, in the number of personnel dedicated to the delivery of professional and technical
services; and (ii) annual compensation increases. The decrease in the services gross margin from
58% in 2002 and 2003 to 53.5% during 2004 was attributable to the shift in product mix to open
systems, fixed price contracts, including unusually high costs associated with the implementation
for one particularly challenging customer, and increased costs due to international expansion and
training. The implementation of our warehouse management open systems products is more costly than
the implementation of our legacy warehouse management product, the iSeries or AS400, due to the
lower maturity level of the product and limited experience of the services
-10-
personnel and
integration requirements with multiple third party hardware and software products. Due to the
shift towards open systems sales and less implementation services on our other products outside of
warehouse management, we do not anticipate our services gross margin to return to the 2002 and 2003
levels, although some improvement is anticipated.
Cost of Hardware and other. Cost of hardware decreased from approximately $13.6 million in
2002 and 2003 to approximately $13.1 million in 2004 as a direct result of lower sales of hardware.
Cost of hardware and other includes out-of-pocket expenses to be reimbursed by customers of
approximately $5.4 million, $6.5 million and $7.0 million for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The increase in reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses is due to increased travel related to the
increase in services projects.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses primarily consist of salaries and
other personnel-related costs for personnel involved in our research and development activities.
The increases in research and development expenses from 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 are
principally attributable to: (i) increases in the number of full-time and contracted personnel
dedicated to our ongoing research and development activities; (ii) the expansion of our offshore
development center in India, which was formed in 2002; and (iii) annual compensation increases.
Domestic research and development personnel increased by approximately 11% from the end of 2002 to
the end of 2003 and 4% from the end of 2003 to the end of 2004. The number of personnel related to
our offshore development center increased from 32 at December 31, 2002 to 164 at December 31, 2003
to 279 at December 31, 2004. Our principal research and development activities in 2004 focused on
the expansion and integration of new products and the synchronized product release, which included
expanded product functionality, interoperability and testing.
Computer software development costs are charged to research and development expense until
technological feasibility is established, after which remaining software production costs are
capitalized. We have defined technological feasibility as the point in time at which we have a
detailed program design or a working model of the related product, depending upon the type of
development effort. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, we capitalized no
research and development costs because the costs between the attainment of technological
feasibility for the related software product through the date of general release were
insignificant.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries, commissions, travel
and other personnel-related costs of sales and marketing personnel and the costs of our marketing
and alliance programs and related activities. The increases in sales and marketing expenses from
2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 are principally attributable to: (i) an increase in salary-related
costs resulting from a 9% increase in the average number of international and domestic sales and
marketing personnel in 2003 compared to 2002 and no increase in 2004 compared to 2003; (ii) greater
incentive compensation paid on 7% and 15% higher license and hosting fees in 2003 over 2002 and
2004 over 2003, respectively; and (iii) continued global expansion of our sales and marketing
programs.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries
and other personnel-related costs of executive, financial, human resources, information technology
and administrative personnel, as well as facilities, depreciation, legal, insurance, accounting and
other administrative expenses. The increases in general and administrative expenses from 2002 to
2003 and 2003 to 2004 were principally attributable to increases in salary-related costs from
increases of approximately 16% each year in the average number of general and administrative
personnel, primarily from our international expansion, and increased audit and outside consulting
costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. The increases in general and administrative
expenses from 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 were partially offset by decreases in the amount of
expense recorded to provide for sales taxes on consulting and maintenance services performed in
those years by our employees for our customers where the collectibility of those taxes from our
customers is uncertain. During 2002 and 2003, we recorded sales tax expense of approximately $1.2
million and $30,000, respectively, and in 2004, we recorded a reduction in sales tax expense of
approximately $191,000. The sales tax expense decreased as a result of the expiration of certain
state sales tax statutes, which resulted in the reversal of previously recorded sales tax
liabilities. Depreciation expense is included in general and administrative expenses and was $6.3
million, $7.6 million and $7.2 million during 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
-11-
Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles. We have recorded goodwill and other
acquisition-related intangible assets as part of the purchase accounting associated with various
acquisitions, including the acquisitions of Logistics.com in December 2002, ReturnCentral in June
2003, Streamsoft in October 2003, Avere in January 2004, and eebiznet in July 2004. The increase
in the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles is the result of amortization of intangible
assets with finite lives that were purchased as part of the various acquisitions. Effective January
1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, which requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets no
longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually.
In-Process Research and Development and Acquisition-Related Charges. On December 31, 2002, we
acquired certain assets of Logistics.com, Inc. from Internet Capital Group for a cash payment of
approximately $21.3 million. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting. The purchase price was allocated to net assets acquired of $1.2 million, acquired
in-process research and development of $1.5 million, acquired developed technology of $1.5 million,
and other intangible assets of $17.1 million.
During the third quarter of 2003, we recorded expenses of $885,000 relating to fees
incurred in connection with two potential acquisitions that we decided not to consummate. The
acquisition-related charges are presented as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and consist primarily of legal, accounting and travel expenses associated with the two
transactions.
Restructuring Charge. During the second quarter of 2003, we recorded a restructuring
charge of $893,000 relating to an internal reorganization. The reorganization more closely aligned
our implementation teams and customer support organization with our technical teams. The charge
consisted primarily of severance payments. Approximately $857,000 was paid prior to December 31,
2003 and the remaining $36,000 was and paid out in January 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2002 |
|
2002 to 2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 to 2004 |
|
2004 |
Income from operations (restated) |
|
$ |
35,585 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
$ |
30,494 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
31,609 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
2,746 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
3,257 |
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Income tax provision (restated) |
|
|
14,781 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
12,659 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
13,232 |
|
Percentage of income before income taxes |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Income from Operations. The decrease in operating income from 2002 to 2003 was
attributable to a lower margin on our software fees resulting from our hosting services, a $1.5
million decrease in the amount recovered relating to the bankrupt customer and an overall increase
in operating expenses from the continued investment in global expansion initiatives and the further
development of our product suite. Operating income for 2002 reflects a recovery relating to the
bankrupt customer totaling $2.3
million; a charge for in-process research and development totaling $1.5 million associated
with the acquisition of Logistics.com, $1.2 million of sales tax expense on consulting and
maintenance services performed for customers and non-cash, acquisition-related intangible asset
amortization totaling $1.8 million. Operating income for 2003 reflects a recovery relating to the
bankrupt customer totaling $0.8 million; acquisition-related expenses of $0.9 million; a
restructuring charge of $0.9 million; and non-cash, acquisition-related intangible asset
amortization totaling $3.4 million. The increase in operating income from 2003 to 2004 resulted
from the growth in higher margin software fees. Operating income for 2004 reflects
acquisition-related intangible asset amortization totaling $3.6 million.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net includes interest income and interest expense and
foreign currency gains and losses. Interest income decreased from $2.1 million in 2002 to $1.5
million in 2003 due to an overall decline in market interest rates, and increased to $2.4 million
in 2004 due to an overall increase in market interest rates along with an increase in the cash
available to invest. The weighted-average interest rate on investment securities at December 31,
2002 was approximately 1.4%, as compared to 1.1% at December 31, 2003 and 2.2% at December 31,
2004. Interest expense was $147,000 in 2002, $13,000 in 2003, and $26,000 in 2004. We recorded
net foreign currency gains of $0.8 million in 2002, $1.3 million in 2003, and $0.9 million in 2004.
The foreign
-12-
currency gains resulted from gains on intercompany transactions denominated in U.S.
dollars with subsidiaries due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other foreign
currencies, primarily the British Pound and Euro.
Income Tax Provision. The fluctuation in the income tax provision during 2003 and 2004 is
directly attributable to the decrease during 2003 and increase during 2004 of income before income
taxes. Our effective income tax rates were 38.5%, 38.1% and 38.0% in 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. Our effective income tax rate takes into account the source of taxable income,
domestically by state and internationally by country, and available income tax credits. The
decrease in the tax rates in 2003 was attributable to an increase in income generated in countries
with lower tax rates. The impact of the restatement on the 2002, 2003 and 2004 income tax rates
was an increase of approximately 2.2%, 3.9% and 1.6% from the previously reported income tax rates.
The provisions for income taxes for 2002, 2003 and 2004 do not include the $14.0 million, $14.2
million and $9.7 million of tax benefits realized from stock options exercised during the years,
respectively. These tax benefits reduce our income tax liabilities and are included in additional
paid-in capital.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During 2003 and 2004, we funded our operations primarily through cash generated from
operations. As of December 31, 2003, we had $155.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and
investments compared to $172.7 million at December 31, 2004.
Our operating activities provided cash of $45.5 million in 2002, $37.0 million in 2003 and
$44.5 million in 2004. Cash from operating activities for 2002 arose principally from a
substantial increase in operating income, the income tax benefits arising from exercises of stock
options by employees, partially off-set by the increase in accounts receivable. Cash from
operating activities for 2003 arose principally from operating income, the income tax benefits
arising from exercises of stock options by employees, the increase in deferred revenue and rent,
partially off-set by the increase in accounts receivable and decreases in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities. Days sales outstanding increased from 65 days at December 31, 2002 to 76 days
at December 31, 2003, as a result of slower collections associated with international revenues.
Cash from operating activities for 2004 arose principally from operating income, the income tax
benefits arising from exercises of stock options by employees, increases in deferred revenue,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially off-set by the increase in accounts receivable.
Days sales outstanding was 76 days at December 31, 2004, consistent with the prior year.
Our investing activities used approximately $65.7 million, $77.8 million, and $20.9 million of
cash during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. During 2002, our
principal uses of cash were $21.2 million for the acquisition of Logistics.com, $6.0 million for
purchases of capital equipment to support our business and infrastructure and net purchases of
$38.6 million in investments. During 2003, our principal uses of cash were for net purchases of
$65.3 million in investments, purchases of capital equipment of $7.7 million to support our
business and infrastructure, $2.6 million for the acquisitions of ReturnCentral and Streamsoft, and
the $2.0 million investment in Alien Technology. During 2004, our principal uses of cash were $7.6
million for purchases of capital equipment to support our business and infrastructure, $1.7 million
for acquisitions and net purchases of $11.6 million in investments.
Our financing activities used cash of approximately $0.9 million in 2002 and $17.9 million in
2004 and provided approximately $9.0 million of cash in 2003. The principal uses of cash for
financing activities in 2002 was for the repurchase of 260,000 shares of our common stock for
approximately $4.1 million and the repayment of $5.3 million relating to the note payable issued in
conjunction with the acquisition of Intrepa, L.L.C. in October 2000. The principal source of cash
provided by financing activities in 2003 was $9.3 million in proceeds from the issuance of common
stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options. The principal uses of cash for financing
activities in 2004 was for repurchase of 885,400 shares of our common stock for approximately $21.8
million, partially off-set by the proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to the
exercise of stock options of approximately $4.0 million. The stock purchases in 2002 and 2004 were
through open market transactions as part of a publicly-announced repurchase program.
We believe there are opportunities to grow our business through the acquisition of
complementary and synergistic companies, products and technologies. Any material acquisition could
result in a decrease to our working capital depending on the amount, timing and
nature of the consideration to be paid. Our Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase
program covering up to $20 million of our common stock over a period ending no
-13-
later than July 21,
2005, of which $4.2 million in approved but unspent stock repurchases remains at December 31, 2004.
In February 2005, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to $20 million of our common
stock, including the amount that had previously been approved but not yet spent, over a period
ending no later than February 3, 2006. We expect to fund purchases under the program through
existing cash, cash equivalents and investments.
We believe that our existing liquidity and expected cash flows from operations will satisfy
our capital requirements for normal operations for the foreseeable future. We believe that existing
balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our
working capital and capital expenditure needs at least for the next twelve months, although there
can be no assurance that this will be the case.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved the consensus
reached on the EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments. The objective of this Issue is to provide guidance for
identifying impaired investments. EITF 03-1 also provides new disclosure requirements for
investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired. The accounting provisions of EITF 03-1
were effective for all reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004, while the disclosure
requirements were effective only for annual periods ending after June 15, 2004. The adoption of
EITF 03-1 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Income, financial
position or liquidity.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement
123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar
to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than July 1, 2005. Early adoption will be permitted
in periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued.
Statement 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
1. A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the
effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments
granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all
awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain
unvested on the effective date.
2. A modified retrospective method, which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method described above, but also permits
entities to restate based on the amounts previously recognized under Statement 123 for purposes
of pro forma disclosures either (a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of
the year of adoption.
We will adopt Statement 123(R) beginning on July 1, 2005 and are currently in the process of
evaluating which method we will adopt.
As permitted by Statement 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees
using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize no compensation cost
for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)s fair value method will
have a significant impact on our results of operations. The impact of adoption of Statement 123(R)
cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted
in the future. However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that
standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro
forma net income and earnings per share in Note 1. Pro forma net loss
for 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $1.4 million, $7.7 million and $9.0 million,
respectively, compared to reported net income of $23.6 million, $20.6 million
and $21.6 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow,
rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This
-14-
requirement will
reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among
other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of operating cash flows recognized
in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were
$14.0 million, $14.2 million, and $9.7
million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Financial Accounting Standard
(FAS) 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the Act) that provides tax relief to U.S. domestic manufacturers. The FSP states that the
manufacturers deduction provided for under the Act should be accounted for as a special deduction
in accordance with Statement 109 rather than as a tax rate reduction. Also in December 2004, the
FASB issued FSP FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, addressing accounting and
disclosure guidance relating to a companys repatriation program. The additional disclosures
required under this FSP are included in Note 3, Income Taxes. Both FSPs were effective upon
issuance.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Our principal commitments as of December 31, 2004, consist of obligations under operating
leases. We expect to fulfill all of the following commitments from our working capital.
Lease Commitments
We lease certain of our facilities and some of our equipment under noncancelable
operating lease arrangements that expire at various dates through 2008. Rent expense for these
leases aggregated $4.0 million, $5.0 million and $5.9 million during fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively.
The following table summarizes our contractual commitments as of December 31, 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
Non-cancelable operating leases |
|
$ |
22,233 |
|
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
|
$ |
6,373 |
|
|
$ |
6,007 |
|
|
$ |
2,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
Capital leases |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Indemnifications
Our sales agreements with customers generally contain infringement indemnity provisions.
Under these agreements, we agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the customer in connection
with patent, copyright or trade secret infringement claims made by third parties with respect to
the customers authorized use of our products and services. The indemnity provisions generally
provide for our control of defense and settlement and cover costs and damages finally awarded
against the customer, as well as our modification of the product so it is no longer infringing or,
if it cannot be corrected, return of the product for a refund. Our sales agreements with customers
sometimes also contain indemnity provisions for death, personal injury or property damage caused by
our personnel or contractors in the course of performing services to customers. Under these
agreements, we agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the customer in connection with death,
personal injury and property damage claims made by third parties with respect to actions of our
personnel or contractors. The indemnity provisions generally provide for our control of defense
and settlement and cover costs and damages finally awarded against the customer. The indemnity
obligations contained in sales agreements generally have no specified expiration date and no
specified monetary limitation on the amount of award covered. We have not previously incurred
costs to settle claims or pay awards under these indemnification obligations. We account for these
indemnity obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and record a
liability for these obligations when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. We have not
recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 2004.
We warrant to our customers that our software products will perform in all material respects
in accordance with our standard published specifications in effect at the time of delivery of the
licensed products to the customer for 90 days after first use of the licensed products, but no more
than 24 months after execution of the license agreement. Additionally, we warrant to our customers
that our services will be performed consistent with generally accepted industry standards or
specific service levels through completion of the agreed upon services. If necessary, we would
provide for the estimated cost of product and service warranties based on specific warranty claims
and claim history. However, we have not incurred significant recurring expense under our product
or service warranties. As a result,
-15-
we believe the estimated fair value of these agreements is
nominal. Accordingly, we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Index |
|
Page |
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
|
17 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
|
19 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
21 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 (Restated)
|
|
|
22 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004 (Restated)
|
|
|
23 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 (Restated)
|
|
|
24 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 (Restated)
|
|
|
25 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 (Restated)
|
|
|
26 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Restated)
|
|
|
27 |
|
-16-
MANAGEMENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING (AS
REVISED)
Management of the
Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance to the Companys management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2004 due to material
weaknesses.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As of December 31, 2004, management has
determined that:
|
§ |
|
The Companys controls over monitoring vendor-specific objective
evidence of fair value for undelivered elements related to sales
contracts with multiple revenue elements were insufficient.
Although no material misstatements related to revenue recognition
were discovered, until this deficiency is remediated, there is a
more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the
annual or interim consolidated financial statements could occur
and not be prevented or detected by the Companys controls in a
timely manner. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Companys controls over monitoring the completeness and
accuracy of the determination and reporting of sales tax payable were insufficient. Specifically,
the Company did not have personnel with sufficient skills and
experience to enable the Company to properly determine whether
certain consulting and maintenance services were considered
taxable transactions in certain states. As a result, the Company
concluded that its previously reported general and administrative
expenses and accrued liabilities had been understated. These control
deficiencies resulted in the restatement of the annual
consolidated financial statements for 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
each of the quarters in the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2004. |
|
|
§ |
|
The Companys review and approval controls over the accounting
for income taxes, including the determination and reporting of
income taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities
and the related income tax provision were insufficient.
Specifically, the Company did not have personnel with sufficient
skills and experience to enable the Company to properly consider
and apply generally accepted accounting principles for taxes, and
ensure that the rationale for certain tax positions was
adequately documented and appropriately communicated.
Additionally, the Company did not maintain effective controls to
review and monitor the accuracy of the components of the income
tax provision calculations and the related deferred income taxes
and income taxes payable. As a result, the Company concluded that its
previously reported income tax provision, current and noncurrent
deferred income taxes, and income taxes payable had been misstated. These control deficiencies resulted in
the restatement of the annual consolidated financial statements
for 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for each of the quarters in the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. |
Because of these material weaknesses, we have concluded that the Company did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the criteria
in the Internal Control Integrated Framework. We
previously had concluded that the Company did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting because of the material
weakness related to insufficient controls over monitoring
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value for undelivered
elements related to sales contracts with multiple revenue elements as
described above. In connection with the restatement of the
Companys consolidated financial statements as discussed in
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we have
determined that the additional material weaknesses described above
also existed at December 31, 2004. Accordingly, we have revised
our annual report on internal control over financial reporting.
-17-
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm who also audited the Companys consolidated financial statements. Ernst & Youngs
attestation report on managements assessment of the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting appears beginning on page 19 hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven R. Norton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Norton |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
-18-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
We
have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Manhattan Associates, Inc. did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect
of the material weaknesses identified in managements assessment and described below, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Manhattan Associates,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been
identified and included in managements assessment:
The Companys controls over monitoring
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value for undelivered elements related to sales
contracts with multiple revenue elements were insufficient. Although no material misstatements
related to revenue recognition were discovered, until this deficiency is remediated, there is a
more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated
financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected by the Companys controls in a
timely manner.
The Companys controls over monitoring the completeness and accuracy
of the determination and reporting of sales tax payable were
insufficient. Specifically, the Company did not have personnel with sufficient skills and
experience to enable the Company to properly determine whether certain consulting and maintenance
services were considered taxable transactions in certain states. As a
result, the Company concluded that its previously reported general
and administrative expenses and accrued liabilities had been
understated. These control
-19-
deficiencies resulted in the restatement of the annual consolidated financial statements for
2002, 2003 and 2004 and for each of the quarters in the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004.
The Companys review and approval controls over the accounting for income taxes, including the
determination and reporting of income taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and
the related income tax provision were insufficient. Specifically, the Company did not have
personnel with sufficient skills and experience to enable the Company to properly consider and
apply generally accepted accounting principles for taxes, and ensure that the rationale for certain
tax positions was adequately documented and appropriately communicated. Additionally, the Company
did not maintain effective controls to review and monitor the accuracy of the components of the
income tax provision calculations and the related deferred income taxes and income taxes payable.
As a result, the Company concluded that its previously reported
income tax provision, current and noncurrent deferred income taxes,
and income taxes payable had been misstated. These control deficiencies resulted in the restatement of the annual consolidated financial
statements for 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for each of the quarters in the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004.
Management
previously had concluded that the Company did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting because of the material
weakness related to insufficient controls over monitoring
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value for undelivered
elements related to sales contracts with multiple revenue elements as
described above. In connection with the restatement of the
Companys consolidated financial statements as discussed in
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, management has
determined that the additional material weaknesses described above
also existed at December 31, 2004. As a result, management has
revised its assessment to include these additional material
weaknesses in their conclusion that the Companys internal
control over financial reporting was not effective as of
December 31, 2004. Accordingly, we have revised our annual
report on internal control over financial reporting to include a
description of these additional material weaknesses.
These
material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature,
timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004
consolidated financial statements (as restated), and this report does
not affect our report dated March 16, 2005, except for
Note 2 as to which the date is February 28, 2006, on those
consolidated financial statements (as restated).
In our opinion, managements assessment that Manhattan Associates, Inc. did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the COSO control criteria. Also, in our opinion, because of the
effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the
control criteria, Manhattan Associates, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO control criteria.
Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2005, except for the effect of the material
weaknesses described in the seventh, eighth, and ninth
paragraphs above, as to which the date is February 28, 2006
-20-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Manhattan Associates, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 (as restated), and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 (as restated). Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial
statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2003 and 2004
(as restated), and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 (as restated), in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 have been restated as discussed in Note 2.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 16, 2005, except for the effect of the material weaknesses described in the seventh, eighth, and ninth paragraphs in that report, as to which the date is
February 28, 2006, expressed
an unqualified opinion on managements assessment and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting.
Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2005, except for
Note 2, as to which the date is February 28, 2006
-21-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (RESTATED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,407 |
|
|
$ |
37,429 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
114,549 |
|
|
|
88,794 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of a $3,181 and $4,171 allowance
for doubtful accounts in 2003 and 2004, respectively |
|
|
40,790 |
|
|
|
45,996 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
4,939 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
196,360 |
|
|
|
184,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
13,015 |
|
|
|
13,598 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
46,433 |
|
Acquisition-related intangible assets, net |
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
|
8,320 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
32,469 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
|
6,639 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
12,647 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
17,937 |
|
|
|
22,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
41,502 |
|
|
|
50,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (see footnote 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding in 2003 or 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 30,086,164 shares issued and outstanding in
2003 and 29,580,724 shares issued and outstanding in 2004 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
146,614 |
|
|
|
139,871 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
76,721 |
|
|
|
98,355 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
224,158 |
|
|
|
239,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Balance Sheets.
-22-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (RESTATED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and hosting fees |
|
$ |
40,233 |
|
|
$ |
43,229 |
|
|
$ |
49,886 |
|
Services |
|
|
110,516 |
|
|
|
129,320 |
|
|
|
141,492 |
|
Hardware and other |
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
Recovery relating to bankrupt customer |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
175,721 |
|
|
|
196,814 |
|
|
|
214,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and hosting fees |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
Amortization of acquired developed technology |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
46,611 |
|
|
|
54,218 |
|
|
|
65,853 |
|
Cost of hardware and other |
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
20,123 |
|
|
|
20,071 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
20,780 |
|
|
|
26,982 |
|
|
|
28,822 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
26,413 |
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
34,049 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
26,855 |
|
In-process research and development
and other acquisition-related charges |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
140,136 |
|
|
|
166,320 |
|
|
|
183,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
35,585 |
|
|
|
30,494 |
|
|
|
31,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
38,386 |
|
|
|
33,240 |
|
|
|
34,866 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
14,781 |
|
|
|
12,659 |
|
|
|
13,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,653 |
|
|
|
29,532 |
|
|
|
30,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,451 |
|
|
|
30,882 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Statements of Income.
-23-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (RESTATED)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
|
|
27,719,753 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
104,445 |
|
|
$ |
32,535 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
137,127 |
|
Cancellation of
common stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
|
1,571,354 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,636 |
|
Buyback of
Manhattan common stock |
|
|
(260,000 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,110 |
) |
Tax benefit from
stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
Amortization of
deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
|
29,031,107 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
122,977 |
|
|
|
56,140 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
179,618 |
|
Cancellation of
common stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
|
1,046,948 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,270 |
|
Issuance of restricted
Stock |
|
|
8,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from
stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,170 |
|
Amortization of
deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
30,086,164 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
146,614 |
|
|
|
76,721 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
224,158 |
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
|
334,157 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
Issuance of restricted
Stock |
|
|
45,803 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Buyback of
Manhattan common stock |
|
|
(885,400 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(21,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,763 |
) |
Tax benefit from
stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
Amortization of
deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
29,580,724 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
|
$ |
98,355 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
(387 |
) |
|
$ |
239,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity.
-24-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (RESTATED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax expense
of $174, $248, and $222 in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax benefit
of $16, $8, and $136 in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
23,883 |
|
|
$ |
21,048 |
|
|
$ |
21,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income.
-25-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (RESTATED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,801 |
|
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
7,207 |
|
Amortization of acquired developed technology and
acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency gain |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(643 |
) |
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of options exercised |
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
14,170 |
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(3,685 |
) |
|
|
(6,814 |
) |
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(1,878 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
1,413 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
1,898 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3,166 |
|
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
45,446 |
|
|
|
36,995 |
|
|
|
44,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
(7,733 |
) |
|
|
(7,572 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(114,728 |
) |
|
|
(609,078 |
) |
|
|
(1,095,608 |
) |
Maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
76,151 |
|
|
|
543,751 |
|
|
|
1,083,982 |
|
Payments in connection with the investment in Alien Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments in connection with various acquisitions,
net of cash acquired (see footnote 7) |
|
|
(21,163 |
) |
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(65,730 |
) |
|
|
(77,810 |
) |
|
|
(20,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of note payable |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
Purchase of Manhattan common stock |
|
|
(4,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,763 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from option exercises |
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
9,270 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
(17,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency impact on cash |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(20,865 |
) |
|
|
(31,757 |
) |
|
|
6,022 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
84,029 |
|
|
|
63,164 |
|
|
|
31,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
63,164 |
|
|
$ |
31,407 |
|
|
$ |
37,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refund received) for income taxes |
|
$ |
(2,478 |
) |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
2,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
-26-
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (RESTATED)
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Business
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (Manhattan or the Company) is a provider of technology-based
solutions to improve supply chain effectiveness and efficiencies across the supply chain. The
Companys solutions are designed to optimize the receipt, storage, assembly and distribution of
inventory and the management of equipment and personnel within a distribution center, enhance the
management of transportation costs and transportation providers, and improve the management of
trading partners. The Companys solutions consist of software, including, the licensing or hosting
of a comprehensive suite of robust and modular software products; services, including design,
configuration, implementation and training services, plus customer support services and software
enhancements subscriptions; and hardware.
The Companys operations are in North America, Europe and Asia/Pacific. Its European
operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Manhattan Associates Limited,
Manhattan Associates Europe B.V., Manhattan France SARL, and Manhattan Associates GmbH, in the
United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany, respectively. The Companys Asia/Pacific
operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Manhattan Associates Pty Ltd.,
Manhattan Associates KK, Manhattan Associates Software (Shanghai), Co. Ltd., Manhattan Associates
Software Pte Ltd., and Manhattan Associates (India) Development Centre Private Limited in
Australia, Japan, China, Singapore, and India, respectively. The Company occasionally sells its
products and services in other countries, such as countries in Latin America, through its direct
sales channel as well as various reseller channels.
Principles of Consolidation and Foreign Currency Translation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries have been translated into United States
dollars in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Revenues and expenses from
international operations were denominated in the respective local currencies and translated using
the average monthly exchange rates for the year. All balance sheet accounts have been translated
using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and the effect of changes in exchange
rates from year to year are disclosed as a separate component of shareholders equity and
comprehensive income.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents.
-27-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short- and long-term investments and
accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and short- and long-term
investments with various financial institutions. The Companys sales are primarily to companies
located in the United States, Europe and Asia. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of
its customers financial condition and does not require collateral. Accounts receivable are due
principally from large U.S., European and Asia Pacific companies under stated contract terms.
Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2003 for the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific
companies were $31.1 million, $9.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Accounts receivable as
of December 31, 2004 for the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific companies were $32.3 million,
$11.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The Company provides for estimated uncollectible
amounts and credit losses at the time of sale.
The Companys top five customers in aggregate accounted for 16%, 16% and 14% of total revenue
for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. No single customer
accounted for more than 10% of revenue in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004. On
January 22, 2002, a significant customer for 2001 filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the filing, the uncertainties around the bankruptcy
proceedings and the ultimate timing of payment, we recorded an allowance of $4.3 million in 2001 to
effectively defer revenues arising in the fourth quarter of 2001 from the significant customer, but
unpaid at the time of the bankruptcy declaration. The allowance included approximately $2.3
million of software fees, $1.6 million of fees for professional services and $0.4 million of
hardware. In September 2002, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Illinois Eastern Division authorized the significant customers request to assume the software
license, services, support and enhancement agreement. With the appeals process completed in
October 2002, the Company recovered approximately $2.3 million of the receivable during the fourth
quarter of 2002. Upon receiving the final cash settlement in June 2003, subsequent to the
significant customer emerging from bankruptcy, the Company recovered an additional $848,000 of the
receivable during the second quarter of 2003. The recoveries were recorded as separate revenue line
items in the Consolidated Statements of Income and reductions to the allowance for doubtful
accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets during the respective quarters.
Investments
The Companys investments in marketable securities consist of debt instruments of the U.S.
Treasury, U.S. government agencies, state and local government agencies and corporate commercial
paper. These investments are categorized as available-for-sale securities and recorded at fair
market value, as defined by SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. Investments with original maturities of 90 days or less are classified as cash
equivalents; investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days but less than one year
are classified as short-term investments; and those with original maturities of greater than one
year are classified as long-term investments. The long-term investments consist of debt
instruments of U.S. government agencies and mature after one year through five years. The Company
holds investments in Auction Rate Securities, which have original maturities greater than one year,
but which have auctions to reset the yield every 7 to 35 days. The Company has classified these
assets as short-term investments. Unrealized holding gains and losses are reflected as a net amount
in a separate component of shareholders equity until realized. For the purposes of computing
realized gains and losses, cost is identified on a specific identification basis.
-28-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The following is a summary of the available-for-sale securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
Cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
25,823 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
25,828 |
|
|
$ |
13,150 |
|
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
$ |
8,447 |
|
State and local obligations |
|
|
110,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,909 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
U.S. corporate commercial paper |
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
12,171 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
149,312 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
149,317 |
|
|
$ |
25,321 |
|
|
$ |
114,549 |
|
|
$ |
9,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
7,659 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
State and local obligations |
|
|
87,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
87,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,949 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
U.S. corporate commercial paper |
|
|
66,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
66,195 |
|
|
|
26,060 |
|
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
37,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
161,677 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
161,287 |
|
|
$ |
26,060 |
|
|
$ |
88,794 |
|
|
$ |
46,433 |
|
As of December 31, 2004, $38.1 million, $35.7 million, $0 and $87.5 million of the
Companys investments mature within 1 year, after 1 year through 5 years, after 5 years through 10
years and after 10 years, respectively.
On July 11, 2003, the Company made a cash investment of $2 million in Alien Technology Corp.
(Alien), a provider of ultra-low cost radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and hardware.
The investment represents approximately a 1.5% ownership interest in the privately-held
corporation. The Companys maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with Alien is
its investment of $2 million. The investment has been accounted for under the cost method, and is
included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of this investment
is not estimated as there were no identified events or changes in circumstances that had a
significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, which is
based upon an evaluation of historical amounts written-off, the Companys customers ability to pay
and general economic conditions; the useful lives of intangible assets; self insurance accruals;
the recoverability or impairment of intangible asset values; and the Companys effective income tax
rate and deferred tax assets, which are based upon the Companys expectations of future taxable
income, allowable deductions, and projected tax credits. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other financial
instruments included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate their fair values
principally due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. Unrealized gains and losses on
investments are included as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income, net
of any related tax effect, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
-29-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Risks Associated with Single Business Line, Technological Advances, and Foreign Operations
The Company currently derives a substantial portion of its revenues from sales of its software
and related services and hardware. The markets for supply chain execution are subject to rapid
technological change, changing customer needs, frequent new product introductions, and evolving
industry standards that may render existing products and services obsolete. As a result, the
Companys position in these markets could be eroded rapidly by unforeseen changes in customer
requirements for application features, functions, and technologies. The Companys growth and
future operating results will depend, in part, upon its ability to enhance existing applications
and develop and introduce new applications that meet changing customer requirements that respond to
competitive products and that achieve market acceptance. Any factor adversely affecting the
markets for supply chain execution solutions could have an adverse effect on the Companys
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Companys international business is subject to risks typical of an international business,
including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate,
differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility.
Accordingly, the future results could be materially adversely impacted by changes in these or
other factors. The Company recognized foreign exchange rate gains of approximately $830,000 in
2002, $1,283,000 in 2003 and $927,000 in 2004, classified in Other income, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revenue Recognition
The Companys revenue consists of revenues from the licensing and hosting of software; fees
from consulting, implementation and training services (collectively, professional services), plus
customer support services and software enhancement subscriptions; and sales of hardware.
The Company recognizes software license revenue under Statement of Position No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions (SOP 98-9), specifically
when the following criteria are met: (1) a signed contract is obtained; (2) delivery of the product
has occurred; (3) the license fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility is probable.
SOP 98-9 requires recognition of revenue using the residual method when (1) there is
vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair values of all undelivered elements in a
multiple-element arrangement that is not accounted for using long-term contract accounting; (2)
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value does not exist for one or more of the delivered
elements in the arrangement; and (3) all revenue-recognition criteria in SOP 97-2, other than the
requirement for vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of each delivered element of
the arrangement are satisfied. For those contracts that contain significant customization or
modifications, license revenue is recognized under the percentage of completion method.
The Companys services revenue consists of fees generated from professional services, customer
support services and software enhancement subscriptions related to the Companys software products.
Fees from professional services performed by the Company are generally billed on an hourly basis,
and revenue is recognized as the services are performed. Professional services are sometimes
rendered under agreements in which billings are limited to contractual maximums or based upon a
fixed-fee for portions of or all of the engagement. Revenue related to fixed-fee based contracts
is recognized on a percent complete basis based on the hours incurred. Project losses are provided
for in their entirety in the period in which they become known. Revenue related to customer
support services and software enhancement subscriptions are generally paid in advance and
recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, typically 12 months.
Hardware revenue is generated from the resale of a variety of hardware products, developed and
manufactured by third parties, that are integrated with and complementary to the Companys software
solutions. As part of a complete solution, the Companys customers frequently purchase hardware
from the Company in conjunction with the licensing of software. These products include computer
hardware, radio frequency terminals networks, RFID chip readers, bar code printers and scanners,
and other peripherals. Hardware revenue is recognized upon shipment to the customer when title
passes. The Company generally purchases hardware from its vendors only after receiving an order
from a customer. As a result, the Company does not maintain significant hardware inventory.
-30-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
In accordance with the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14 (EITF No. 01-14),
Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred,
the Company recognizes amounts associated with reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue. Such amounts have been classified to hardware and other revenue. The total
amount of expense reimbursement recorded to revenue was $5.4 million, $6.5 million and $7.0 million
for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts collected prior to having completed performance of
professional services, customer support services and software enhancement subscriptions and
significant remaining obligations under license agreements. The Company expects to complete such
services or obligations within the next twelve months.
Returns and Allowances
The Company has not experienced significant returns or warranty claims to date and, as a
result, has not recorded a provision for the cost of returns and product warranty claims at
December 31, 2003 or 2004.
The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the historical experience of
write-offs and a detailed assessment of accounts receivable. Additions to the allowance for
doubtful accounts generally represent a sales allowance on services revenue, which are recorded to
operations as a reduction to services revenue. The total amounts charged to operations were $3.1
million, $3.5 million and $4.0 million for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. In estimating the
allowance for doubtful accounts, management considers the age of the accounts receivable, the
Companys historical write-offs, and the credit worthiness of the customer, among others. Should
any of these factors change, the estimates made by management will also change accordingly, which
could affect the level of the Companys future provision for doubtful accounts. Uncollectible
accounts are written off when it is determined that the specific balance is not collectible.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of furniture, computers, other office equipment, purchased
software for internal use, and leasehold improvements recorded at cost. The Company depreciates
the cost of furniture, computers, other office equipment and purchased software on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives (three years for computer equipment and software, five
years for office equipment, seven years for furniture). Leasehold improvements are depreciated
over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Included in computer equipment and
software are assets under a capital lease of approximately $247,000 as of December 31, 2003 and
2004. Accumulated depreciation relating to the assets under a capital lease was $0 and $82,000 as
of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for property
and equipment, including assets under a capital lease, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003
and 2004 was approximately $6,275,000, $7,639,000 and $7,207,000, respectively, and was included in
general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Computer equipment and software |
|
$ |
23,624 |
|
|
$ |
29,198 |
|
Furniture and office equipment |
|
|
7,432 |
|
|
|
8,221 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,799 |
|
|
|
42,677 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(22,784 |
) |
|
|
(29,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,015 |
|
|
$ |
13,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-31-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets
Acquisition-related intangible assets are stated at historical cost and include acquired
software and certain other intangible assets with definite lives. The acquired software is being
amortized over the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross revenues
for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product
or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product including
the period being reported on. The other intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over a period of two to ten years. Total amortization expense related to acquisition-related
intangible assets was approximately $1,772,000, $3,432,000 and $3,575,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and is included in amortization of acquired
developed technology and amortization of acquisition-related intangibles in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired software |
|
$ |
10,218 |
|
|
$ |
11,171 |
|
Other intangible assets with definite lives |
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,815 |
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired software |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
Other intangible assets with definite lives |
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,873 |
|
|
|
11,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired software |
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,643 |
|
Other intangible assets with definite lives |
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,942 |
|
|
$ |
8,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects amortization expense for the next five years to be as follows based
on intangible assets as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
3,264 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,014 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1,855 |
|
2008 |
|
|
744 |
|
2009 |
|
|
418 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
25 |
|
Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net identified tangible
and intangible assets and liabilities acquired is no longer being amortized. On January 1, 2002,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under the new statement,
the Company no longer amortizes goodwill, but instead tests for impairment on at least an annual
basis. Goodwill consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
36,268 |
|
|
$ |
37,049 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,688 |
|
|
$ |
32,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $35.8 million of the gross Goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
-32-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Software Development Costs
Research and development expenses are charged to expense as incurred. The Company determines
the amount of development costs capitalizable under the provisions of SFAS No. 86, Accounting for
Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Computer software
development costs are charged to research and development expense until technological feasibility
is established, after which remaining software production costs are capitalized in accordance with
SFAS No. 86. The Company has defined technological feasibility as the point in time at which the
Company has a detailed program design or a working model of the related product, depending on the
type of development efforts. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company
capitalized no internal research and development costs because the costs incurred between the
attainment of technological feasibility for the related software product through the date when the
product was available for general release to customers has been insignificant. Total amortization
expense related to software development costs capitalized prior to 2002 was approximately $526,000,
$343,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and is included
in cost of software and hosting fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. As of
December 31, 2003 and 2004, all capitalized development costs were fully amortized.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company periodically reviews the values assigned to long-lived assets, including property
and certain intangible assets, to determine whether events and circumstances have occurred which
indicate that the remaining estimated useful lives may warrant revision or that the remaining
balances may not be recoverable. In such reviews, undiscounted cash flows associated with these
assets are compared with their carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is
required. Management believes the long-lived and intangible assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets are fairly valued.
The evaluation of asset impairment requires management to make assumptions about future cash
flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment,
and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Impairment of Goodwill
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted in
its entirety on January 1, 2002, the Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and other
intangible assets annually as of December 31 and between annual evaluations if events occur or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to, (1) a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition,
or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether the goodwill or
other intangible asset is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to
which the goodwill or other intangible asset is assigned to its carrying amount, including goodwill
and the other intangible assets. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair
value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be
calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount.
In calculating the implied fair value of goodwill or other intangible assets, the fair value of the
reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their
fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its
other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The initial evaluation of
goodwill and other intangible assets completed as of June 30, 2002 in accordance with SFAS No. 142
resulted in no impairment losses. Additionally, the Company performed its periodic review of its
goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and did
not identify any asset impairment as a result of the review.
-33-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Guarantees and Indemnifications
The Company accounts for guarantees in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. The Companys sales agreements with customers generally contain
infringement indemnity provisions. Under these agreements, the Company agrees to indemnify, defend
and hold harmless the customer in connection with patent, copyright or trade secret infringement
claims made by third parties with respect to the customers authorized use of the Companys
products and services. The indemnity provisions generally provide for the Companys control of
defense and settlement and cover costs and damages finally awarded against the customer, as well as
the Companys modification of the product so it is no longer infringing or, if it cannot be
corrected, return of the product for a refund. The sales agreements with customers sometimes also
contain indemnity provisions for death, personal injury or property damage caused by the Companys
personnel or contractors in the course of performing services to customers. Under these
agreements, the Company agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the customer in connection
with death, personal injury and property damage claims made by third parties with respect to
actions of the Companys personnel or contractors. The indemnity provisions generally provide for
the Companys control of defense and settlement and cover costs and damages finally awarded against
the customer. The indemnity obligations contained in sales agreements generally have no specified
expiration date and no specified monetary limitation on the amount of award covered. The Company
has not previously incurred costs to settle claims or pay awards under these indemnification
obligations. The Company accounts for these indemnity obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and records a liability for these obligations when a loss is probable
and reasonably estimable. The Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of
December 31, 2004.
The Company warrants to its customers that its software products will perform in all material
respects in accordance with the standard published specifications in effect at the time of delivery
of the licensed products to the customer for 90 days after first use of the licensed products, but
no more than 24 months after execution of the license agreement. Additionally, the Company
warrants to its customers that services will be performed consistent with generally accepted
industry standards or specific service levels through completion of the agreed upon services. If
necessary, the Company will provide for the estimated cost of product and service warranties based
on specific warranty claims and claim history. However, the Company has not incurred significant
recurring expense under product or service warranties. As a result, the Company believes the
estimated fair value of these agreements is nominal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities
recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2004.
Segment Information
The Company operates in a single segment as defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. See Note 9 for discussion of foreign
operations.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled approximately $715,000, $855,000 and
$534,000 in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Advertising costs are included in sales and
marketing on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed using net income divided by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding (Weighted Shares) for the period presented.
-34-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Diluted net income per share is computed using net income divided by Weighted Shares, and the
treasury stock method effect of common equivalent shares (CESs) outstanding for each period
presented. The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the computation of net income
per share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
Weighted shares |
|
|
28,652,609 |
|
|
|
28,652,609 |
|
|
|
29,532,466 |
|
|
|
29,532,466 |
|
|
|
30,055,916 |
|
|
|
30,055,916 |
|
Effect of CESs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,797,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,652,609 |
|
|
|
30,450,561 |
|
|
|
29,532,466 |
|
|
|
30,881,676 |
|
|
|
30,055,916 |
|
|
|
31,066,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,924,075 shares, 1,866,351 shares and 3,020,952 shares of common
stock were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, but
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise
price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the respective years.
See Note 4 for further information on those securities.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plan for stock issued to employees under
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and, accordingly, records deferred compensation for options granted at an exercise price below the
fair value of the underlying stock. The deferred compensation is presented as a component of
equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and is amortized over the periods to be
benefited, generally the vesting period of the options. Effective in fiscal year 1996, the Company
adopted the pro forma disclosure option for stock-based compensation issued to employees of SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by SFAS No.
123, which also requires that the information be determined as if the Company had accounted for its
employee stock option grants under the fair value method required by SFAS No. 123. The fair value
of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate at the date of grant |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Expected life |
|
6 years |
|
6 years |
|
7.5 years |
Using these assumptions, the fair values of the stock options granted during the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are $24,693,000, $24,980,000 and $32,257,000, respectively,
which would be amortized over the vesting period of the options.
The weighted average fair values of options at the date of grant for the years ended December
31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $16.61, $17.52 and $16.95 per share, respectively.
-35-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The following pro forma information adjusts the net income and net income per share of common
stock for the impact of SFAS No. 123:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income (loss) (restated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported net income, net of taxes |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under the fair-value method for all awards, net of taxes. |
|
|
(25,072 |
) |
|
|
(28,380 |
) |
|
|
(31,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (restated) |
|
$ |
(1,409 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,747 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income or pro forma net income (loss) per share (restated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Pro forma in accordance with SFAS No. 123 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
Diluted net income or pro forma net income (loss) per share (restated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Pro forma in accordance with SFAS No. 123 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R)
is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than July 1, 2005. Early adoption will be permitted
in periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued.
Statement 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
1. A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the
effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments
granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all
awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain unvested
on the effective date.
2. A modified retrospective method, which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate based on the amounts
previously recognized under Statement 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures either (a) all
prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption.
The Company will be adopting Statement 123(R) beginning July 1, 2005 and is currently in the
process of evaluating which method will be adopted.
-36-
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
As permitted by Statement 123, the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to
employees using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize no
compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)s fair
value method will have a significant impact on the Companys results of operations. The impact of
adoption of Statement 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of
share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted Statement 123(R) in
prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as
described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share above. Statement 123(R)
also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current
literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash
flows in periods after adoption. While the Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in
the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the
amount of operating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were
$14.0 million, $14.2 million, and $9.7 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
The Companys comprehensive income includes net income, foreign currency translation
adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments. The components of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the FASB approved the consensus reached on the EITF Issue No. 03-1, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The
objective of this Issue is to provide guidance for identifying impaired investments. EITF 03-1 also
provides new disclosure requirements for investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired.
The accounting provisions of EITF 03-1 were effective for all reporting periods beginning after
June 15, 2004, while the disclosure requirements were effective only for annual periods ending
after June 15, 2004. The adoption of EITF 03-1 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated
Statements of Income, financial position or liquidity.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Financial Accounting Standard
(FAS) 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the Act) that provides tax relief to U.S. domestic manufacturers. The FSP states that the
manufacturers deduction provided for under the Act should be accounted for as a special deduction
in accordance with Statement 109 rather than as a tax rate reduction. Also in December 2004, the
FASB issued FSP FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, addressing accounting and
disclosure guidance relating to a companys repatriation program. The additional disclosures
required under this staff position are included in Note 3, Income Taxes. Both FSPs were effective
upon issuance.
-37-
2. Restatements of Financial Statements
In connection with the financial reporting close process for the year ended December 31, 2005,
management determined that a restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004 was necessary. The determination to restate those
financial statements was made as a result of net income in those years being overstated by a total
of approximately $7.4 million, resulting primarily from an error in the method of computing our
research and development income tax credit following a small acquisition in 1998 and for not
providing the appropriate liability for sales taxes in certain states. Although it is possible to
recover some, if not all, of the lost tax credits through a retroactive relief request from the
Internal Revenue Service and some of the transaction taxes from the Companys customers who
contractually agreed to be responsible for these taxes, the amount of recovery cannot be estimated
precisely and at this time collection is not considered probable.
The following table summarizes the net impact of the restatement corrections by balance sheet
line item as of December 31, 2003, and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Total Current |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
Assets |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Total Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable |
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
2,086 |
|
|
$ |
193,459 |
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
264,882 |
|
|
$ |
3,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,470 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
(553 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
4,987 |
|
|
$ |
196,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,935 |
|
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
$ |
10,376 |
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Liabilities & |
|
|
Total Current |
|
Deferred |
|
Retained |
|
Additional |
|
Shareholders |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Earnings |
|
Paid-in-capital |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
35,296 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
83,653 |
|
|
$ |
143,766 |
|
|
$ |
228,242 |
|
|
$ |
264,882 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(6,932 |
) |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
(4,084 |
) |
|
|
1,726 |
|
As restated |
|
$ |
41,502 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
76,721 |
|
|
$ |
146,614 |
|
|
$ |
224,158 |
|
|
$ |
266,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Refundable |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
Total Current |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
taxes |
|
|
Taxes |
|
Taxes |
|
Assets |
|
Income taxes |
|
Total Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
4,257 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
183,563 |
|
|
$ |
3,583 |
|
|
$ |
290,501 |
|
|
$ |
6,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
4,939 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
184,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
|
$ |
12,647 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Liabilities & |
|
|
Total Current |
|
Deferred |
|
Retained |
|
Additional |
|
Shareholders |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Earnings |
|
Paid-in-capital |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
44,803 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
105,762 |
|
|
$ |
138,074 |
|
|
$ |
244,627 |
|
|
$ |
290,501 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(7,407 |
) |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
(5,610 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
50,617 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,355 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
|
$ |
239,017 |
|
|
$ |
290,239 |
|
-38-
2. Restatements of Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes the net impact of the restatement corrections by income
statement line item for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General & |
|
Total |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
Operating |
|
from |
|
Income before |
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
Expenses |
|
Operations |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Provision |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
20,943 |
|
|
$ |
138,943 |
|
|
$ |
36,778 |
|
|
$ |
39,579 |
|
|
$ |
14,383 |
|
|
$ |
25,196 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
22,136 |
|
|
$ |
140,136 |
|
|
$ |
35,585 |
|
|
$ |
38,386 |
|
|
$ |
14,781 |
|
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
Basic
Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
Diluted
Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
Diluted
Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General & |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
Operating |
|
Income from |
|
Income before |
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
Expenses |
|
Operations |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Provision |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
24,087 |
|
|
$ |
166,290 |
|
|
$ |
30,524 |
|
|
$ |
33,270 |
|
|
$ |
11,425 |
|
|
$ |
21,845 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
24,117 |
|
|
$ |
166,320 |
|
|
$ |
30,494 |
|
|
$ |
33,240 |
|
|
$ |
12,659 |
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
Basic
Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Diluted
Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Diluted
Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General & |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
Operating |
|
Income from |
|
Income before |
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
Expenses |
|
Operations |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Provision |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
27,046 |
|
|
$ |
183,501 |
|
|
$ |
31,418 |
|
|
$ |
34,675 |
|
|
$ |
12,566 |
|
|
$ |
22,109 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(475 |
) |
As restated |
|
$ |
26,855 |
|
|
$ |
183,310 |
|
|
$ |
31,609 |
|
|
$ |
34,866 |
|
|
$ |
13,232 |
|
|
$ |
21,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
Basic
Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Diluted Net Income per Share as previously reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Diluted Net Income per Share as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
3. Income Taxes (Restated)
The Company is subject to future federal and state income taxes and has recorded net deferred
tax assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2004. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial accounting and the tax
bases of assets and liabilities. Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
7,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
3,445 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Research and development credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
AMT Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
Other |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,275 |
|
|
|
8,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,879 |
|
|
|
7,578 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(7,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
7,922 |
|
|
$ |
7,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-39-
3. Income Taxes (Restated) (continued)
The components of income from domestic and foreign operations before income tax expense for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
$ |
31,468 |
|
|
$ |
33,525 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
38,386 |
|
|
$ |
33,240 |
|
|
$ |
34,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the historical income tax provision for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
13,070 |
|
|
$ |
11,056 |
|
|
$ |
12,222 |
|
State |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,862 |
|
|
|
12,792 |
|
|
|
14,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(1,492 |
) |
State |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,781 |
|
|
$ |
12,659 |
|
|
$ |
13,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were allocated to
additional paid-in capital. Such amounts were approximately $14,024,000, $14,170,000 and
$9,686,000 for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The Company has approximately $85,000 of research and development tax credit carryforwards
that expires in 2024.
The valuation allowance referred to above represents the removal of deferred tax items for net
operating loss carryforwards which were generated by stock option exercises recorded to additional
paid-in-capital. In fiscal 2004, all net operating loss carryforwards were utilized therefore the
deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance decreased to $0 at December 31, 2004.
The Company currently has a tax holiday in India through March of 2009. As a result of this
holiday, the Company had income of approximately $771,000 in 2003 and $2,028,000 in 2004 that was
not subject to tax. The India entity did not have income in 2002. The impact on diluted earnings
per share if the income had been taxable was decreases of $.01 per share and $.02 per share in 2003
and 2004, respectively.
Deferred taxes are not provided for temporary differences of approximately $4.2 million, $5.5
million and $8.7 million as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, representing
earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested. Those earnings
are considered to be indefinitely reinvested; accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state
income taxes has been provided thereon. Upon repatriation of those earnings, in the form of
dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to
adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to various foreign countries.
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was signed into law. The
Act provides for a special one-time deduction of 85% of certain foreign earnings that are
repatriated. The Company may elect to apply this provision to qualifying earnings repatriations in
2005. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has started an evaluation of the effects of the
repatriation provision, but does not expect to be able to complete this evaluation until the
second quarter of 2005. While no repatriation decisions have been made as of December 31, 2004,
the range of possible amounts that the Company is considering for repatriation is between zero and
$8.7 million. The related potential range of deferred taxes that would have to be provided should
a repatriation decision be made is between zero and $3 million.
-40-
3. Income Taxes (Restated) (continued)
The following is a summary of the items that cause recorded income taxes to differ from taxes
computed using the statutory federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003
and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
Statutory federal income tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Research and development credits |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Foreign operations |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Tax exempt income |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Stock Option Plans
The Manhattan Associates LLC Option Plan (the LLC Option Plan) became effective on January
1, 1997. The LLC Option Plan is administered by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors.
The options are granted at terms determined by the committee; however, the options cannot have a
term exceeding ten years. Options granted under the LLC Option Plan have vesting periods ranging
from immediately to six years. Subsequent to February 28, 1998, no additional options could be
granted pursuant to the LLC Option Plan.
Prior to the establishment of the LLC Option Plan, the Company issued options to purchase
661,784 shares of common stock to certain employees. These grants contain provisions similar to
options issued under the LLC Option Plan.
The Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan) was
adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders in February 1998. The Stock
Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options. Optionees have the right to
purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified option price and subject to
such terms and conditions as are specified in connection with the option grant. The Stock
Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
committee has the authority to adopt, amend and repeal the administrative rules, guidelines and
practices relating to the Stock Incentive Plan generally and to interpret the provisions thereof.
Options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan cannot have a term exceeding ten years and typically
vest over a period of two to six years.
As of December 31, 2004, the Stock Incentive Plan provides for issuance of up to 13,603,085
shares of common stock (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits and other similar
events), less the number of shares issued under the LLC Option Plan, in the form of stock options
and other stock incentives. The number of shares available for issuance under the Plan is
automatically adjusted, without shareholder approval, on the first day of each fiscal year,
beginning with the 2000 fiscal year, by a number of shares such that the total number of shares
reserved for issuance under the Plan equals the sum of (i) the aggregate number of shares
previously issued under the Plan and the LLC Option Plan; (ii) the aggregate number of shares
subject to then outstanding stock incentives granted under the Plan and the LLC Option Plan; and
(iii) 5% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the preceding
fiscal year. However, no more than 1,000,000 of the shares available for grant each year shall be
available for issuance pursuant to incentive stock options, and no more than 10,000,000 shares
resulting from such automatic adjustments may ever be issued during the term of the Plan.
-41-
4. Stock Option Plans (continued)
A summary of changes in outstanding options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
December 31, 2001 |
|
|
6,532,767 |
|
|
$ |
17.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,637,900 |
|
|
$ |
23.12 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(270,871 |
) |
|
$ |
26.54 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,571,354 |
) |
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
6,328,442 |
|
|
$ |
21.08 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,541,075 |
|
|
$ |
26.40 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(444,541 |
) |
|
$ |
27.90 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,046,948 |
) |
|
$ |
8.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
6,378,028 |
|
|
$ |
23.90 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,938,825 |
|
|
$ |
25.15 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(600,184 |
) |
|
$ |
30.86 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(334,157 |
) |
|
$ |
12.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
7,382,512 |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of options outstanding at December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Options |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Options |
|
Average |
Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price |
$ 0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
286,250 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
|
286,250 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
172,354 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
|
172,236 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
7.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
690,699 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
|
611,366 |
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
15.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.00 |
|
|
|
1,529,100 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
19.68 |
|
|
|
511,857 |
|
|
|
18.31 |
|
23.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.00 |
|
|
|
1,736,215 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
25.38 |
|
|
|
964,909 |
|
|
|
25.55 |
|
27.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
|
|
2,230,744 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
|
849,522 |
|
|
|
28.05 |
|
31.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.00 |
|
|
|
460,400 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
37.52 |
|
|
|
422,825 |
|
|
|
37.84 |
|
40.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.38 |
|
|
|
276,750 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
55.48 |
|
|
|
265,700 |
|
|
|
55.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,382,512 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
|
4,084,665 |
|
|
$ |
23.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the Company has 7,548,179 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance and 111,755 shares available for future grant under the Stock Incentive Plan. On January
1, 2005, the number of shares of common stock available for future grant under the Stock Incentive
Plan was increased by 1,359,172 in accordance with the automatic adjustment described above.
The Company recorded deferred compensation of $580,000 on options granted during 1998, as the
exercise price was less than the deemed fair value of the underlying common stock. In addition,
the Company recorded deferred compensation of $232,000 and $1,290,000 during 2003 and 2004,
respectively, for the issuance of 8,109 and 45,803 shares of restricted stock under the stock
incentive plan. The Company amortizes deferred compensation over the vesting periods on a
straight-line basis. The Company recorded compensation expense of $58,000, $52,000 and $1,101,000
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and had deferred compensation
expense of $198,000 and $387,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
5. Shareholders Equity
During 2002 and 2004, the Company purchased 260,000 and 885,400 shares of the Companys common
stock for approximately $4,110,000 and $21,763,000, respectively, through open market transactions
as part of a publicly-announced buy-back program. No shares of the Companys common stock were
purchased during 2003.
-42-
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
Rents charged to expense were approximately $4,015,000, $5,020,000 and $5,907,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The leases for the Companys
headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia expire on March 31, 2008, at which time the Company has the option
to renew for an additional five years at then current market rates. Aggregate future minimum lease
payments under the capital lease and noncancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Operating |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
2006 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,007 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
22,233 |
|
Less amount representing interest |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net present value of future minimum lease payments |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion of capital lease obligation |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into employment contracts with certain executives and other key
employees. The agreements provide for total severance payments of up to approximately $2.1 million
for termination of employment for any reason other than cause. Payment terms vary from a lump sum
payment to equal monthly installments over a period of not more than 24 months. No amounts have
been accrued because the amounts cannot be reasonably estimated.
Legal and Other Matters
The Company is currently in the process of implementing its warehouse management system at a
large customer with whom it is having challenging discussions surrounding their delayed
implementation, although no legal claims have been filed by either party to date. The Company
believes that its contractual obligations to date have been met and it is entitled to the
outstanding receivables of approximately $3 million from the customer at December 31, 2004. The
Company is in discussions with this customer regarding resolution of this matter as well as
payment; however, no such resolution has been reached at this time. While no assurance can be
given regarding the outcome of the matter discussed, because of the nature and inherent
uncertainties of disputes, should the outcome of this matter be unfavorable, the Companys
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected.
From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of
its ordinary course of business. Many of the Companys installations involve products that are
critical to the operations of its clients businesses. Any failure in a Company product could
result in a claim for substantial damages against the Company, regardless of the Companys
responsibility for such failure. Although the Company attempts to limit contractually its liability
for damages arising from product failures or negligent acts or omissions, there can be no assurance
the limitations of liability set forth in its contracts will be enforceable in all instances. The
Company is not presently involved in any material litigation. However, it is involved in various
legal proceedings. The Company believes that any liability that may arise as a result of these
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. The Company
expenses legal costs associated with loss contingencies as such legal costs are incurred.
-43-
7. Acquisitions
Logistics.com
On December 31, 2002, the Company acquired certain assets of Logistics.com, Inc. from Internet
Capital Group for a one-time cash payment of approximately $21.3 million, of which $1.5 million was
held in escrow until December 31, 2003. Logistics.com provided logistics planning and execution
solutions that provide cost savings to shippers and carriers. The Company acquired the assets of
Logistics.com to enhance its existing transportation management product offering and to expand its
customer base. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and
the results of operations are included in the Companys operations after that date. No amounts
were included in the operating results for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, December 31, 2002 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Research and development assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer software (5 year life) |
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (7 year life) |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename (5 year life) |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles (2 year life) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,119 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.5 million assigned to in-process research and development assets was written off
at the date of acquisition in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 4, Applicability of FASB
Statement No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method.
The Goodwill is not being amortized, but is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis.
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the year ended December 31, 2002, assuming that the
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2002 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
183,537 |
|
Pro forma net income (restated) |
|
|
13,499 |
|
Pro forma diluted net income per share (restated) |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
ReturnCentral
On June 30, 2003, the Company acquired certain assets of ReturnCentral for a cash payment of
approximately $1.5 million. The purchase price includes the earnout of approximately $900,000
recorded through December 31, 2004, and will be further adjusted for additional potential earnout
based upon the total ReturnCentral software and services fees received and recognized prior to
August 31, 2005. The earnout payment for the first twelve months is the sum of: (i) 30% of all
ReturnCentral software fees up to and including $800,000; plus 33% of all ReturnCentral software
fees greater than $800,000 and up to and including $1.3 million; plus 36% of all ReturnCentral
software fees greater than $1.3 million and up to and including $2.0 million; plus 40% of all
ReturnCentral software fees greater than $2.0 million; and (ii) 13% of all ReturnCentral service
fees. The earnout payment, if any, for the following fourteen month period will be the sum of: (i)
30% of all ReturnCentral software fees up to and including $2.0 million; plus 33% of all
ReturnCentral software fees greater than $2.0 million and up to and including $3.0 million; plus
36% of all ReturnCentral software fees greater than $3.0 million and up to and including $4.0
million; plus 40% of all ReturnCentral software fees greater than $4.0 million; and (ii) 13% of all
ReturnCentral service fees. The results of operations are included in operations after June 30,
2003.
-44-
7. Acquisitions (continued)
The entire purchase price has been recorded as acquired developed technology and is being
amortized over the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross revenues
for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product
or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product (5 years)
including the period being reported on.
Streamsoft
On October 14, 2003, the Company closed an Asset Purchase Agreement with Streamsoft, a
provider of warehouse optimization software. The Company acquired substantially all of the assets
of Streamsoft for a purchase price of approximately $2.1 million. The purchase price includes the
earnout of approximately $250,000 recorded through December 31, 2004, and will be further adjusted
for additional potential earnout based upon the total Streamsoft software fees received and
recognized prior to September 30, 2005. The earnout payment shall be calculated as 10% of all net
software fees recognized, and is subject to additional terms and conditions, as defined in the
purchase agreement. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting, and the results of operations are included in operations after October 14, 2003. The
purchase price has been allocated to net assets acquired of $0.2 million, acquired developed
technology of $0.2 million, and other intangible assets of $1.7 million. Acquired developed
technology is being amortized over the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that
current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross
revenues for that product or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic
life of the product (5 years) including the period being reported on. Approximately $0.1 million
of other intangible assets is being amortized over a ten-year useful life. The remaining $1.6
million of other intangible assets is goodwill, which is not being amortized, but is being reviewed
for impairment on an annual basis.
Avere
On January 23, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets of Avere, Inc. (Avere), a provider
of order management software. The Company completed the acquisition to enhance its product
offering. The Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Avere for a purchase price of
approximately $285,000 in cash plus a potential earnout based upon the total Avere software fees
recognized by the Company during the period starting on December 31, 2003 and ending on December
31, 2005. The earnout payment, if any, will be calculated as the following percentages of all
Avere software fees recognized during the earnout period: (i) 25% of the Avere software fees
greater than $200,000 and up to and including $2 million; (ii) 30% of the Avere software fees
greater than $2 million and up to and including $4 million; and (iii) 35% of the Avere software
fees greater than $4 million. The entire purchase price has been recorded as acquired developed
technology and is being amortized over the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that
current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross
revenues for that product or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining five-year estimated
economic life of the product, including the period being reported on. The operating results of
Avere were included in the Companys operations after January 23, 2004.
eebiznet
On July 9, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets of eebiznet (eebiznet), whose primary
business activities consist of the marketing and sale of supply software in France. The Company
acquired eebiznet to expand its presence in Europe. The Company acquired all the outstanding
shares of eebiznet for approximately $493,000 in cash plus a potential earnout based upon the sales
of its software and service solutions in France during the period starting April 1, 2004 through
March 31, 2006. The earnout payment, if any, will be calculated based on the following percentages
of all license sales in France recognized during the period: (i) 30% of the software fees in
France up to 1.5 million ($2.05 million as of December 31, 2004); (ii) 40% of the software fees
in France over 1.5 million ($2.05 million as of December 31, 2004); and (iii) 2% of all service
revenues. The entire purchase price has been recorded on a preliminary basis to goodwill, as
eebiznets assets and liabilities were immaterial. The operating results of eebiznet were included
in the Companys operations after July 9, 2004.
-45-
8. In-Process Research and Development, Acquisition-Related Expenses and Restructuring Charge
In-process research and development represents the value assigned in a purchase business
combination to research and development projects of the acquired business that had commenced but
had not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. In accordance with
SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, as clarified by FASB Interpretation
No. 4, amounts assigned to in-process research and development meeting the above stated criteria
must be charged to expense as part of the allocation of the purchase price of the business
combination. Accordingly, a charge totaling $1,470,000 was recorded during 2002 as part of the
allocation of the purchase price related to the acquisition of Logistics.com.
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company recorded expenses of approximately $885,000
relating to fees incurred in connection with two potential acquisitions that the Company decided
not to consummate. The acquisition-related expenses are presented as a separate line item in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. The expenses consist primarily of legal, accounting and travel
expenses associated with the two transactions.
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a restructuring charge relating to an
internal reorganization of $893,000. The restructuring charge is presented as a separate line item
in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The reorganization more closely aligns the Companys
customer advocates with implementation teams, and the customer support organization with the
technical teams. The charge consists primarily of one-time severance payments to 25 employees. The
Company anticipates no further costs relating to this reorganization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Charge |
|
Paid 2003 |
|
Paid 2004 |
Employee severance-related costs |
|
$ |
893,000 |
|
|
$ |
857,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
9. Geographic and Product Information
Geographic revenue information for the three years ended December 31, 2004 is based on the
location of the customer. Long-lived asset information is based on the physical location of the
assets at the end of each of the fiscal years.
Revenue by geographic region/country was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
142,296 |
|
|
$ |
158,120 |
|
|
$ |
166,267 |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
29,333 |
|
|
|
31,920 |
|
|
|
35,532 |
|
Rest of world |
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
6,774 |
|
|
|
13,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international |
|
|
33,425 |
|
|
|
38,694 |
|
|
|
48,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
175,721 |
|
|
$ |
196,814 |
|
|
$ |
214,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. long-lived assets were approximately $66.4 million and $100.3 million as of
December 31, 2003 (restated) and 2004 (restated), respectively. Total international long-lived
assets, which include assets in Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, the Netherlands,
Singapore and the United Kingdom, were approximately $3.8 million and $5.7 million as of December
31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
-46-
9. Geographic and Product Information (continued)
The software products that the Company sells consist of the following Solution Groups:
Warehouse Management, Transportation Management, Trading Partner Management, Distributed Order
Management, Reverse Logistics Management, Performance Management and RFID. The Company has not
included annual revenue for each of the solution groups in the footnote disclosures primarily to
avoid the somewhat misleading method of allocating the revenue to the various products when
multiple solutions groups are sold in a single contract. Although the Company currently uses the
list prices as a basis for allocating the revenue to the various products, it does not believe that
this information is always an accurate indicator of the products success because of the way
certain products are added to contracts for incentive reasons, although the customer may not have
the desire to implement that product immediately. The allocation method places revenue on products
that could be significantly in excess of the value the customer would place on it in some cases.
Therefore, the Company believes that disclosing the software and hosting fees for the Warehouse
Management Solution Group and combining all other Solution Groups into one is the most useful
information. Software and hosting fees for the three years ended December 31, 2004 were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Warehouse Management Solution Group |
|
$ |
33,653 |
|
|
$ |
25,704 |
|
|
$ |
28,455 |
|
All Other Solution Groups |
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
17,525 |
|
|
|
21,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Software and Hosting Fees |
|
$ |
40,233 |
|
|
$ |
43,229 |
|
|
$ |
49,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Employee Benefit Plan
The Company sponsors the Manhattan Associates 401(k) Plan and Trust (the 401(k) Plan), a
qualified profit sharing plan with a 401(k) feature covering substantially all employees of the
Company. Under the 401(k) Plans deferred compensation arrangement, eligible employees who elect
to participate in the 401(k) Plan may contribute up to 60% of eligible compensation up to $14,000,
as defined, to the 401(k) Plan. The Company provides for a 50% matching contribution up to 6% of
eligible compensation being contributed after the participants first year of employment. During
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company made matching contributions to the
401(k) Plan of $1,006,000, $1,250,000 and $1,314,000, respectively.
11. Related Party Transactions
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company purchased software and services
for approximately $250,000 and $63,000, respectively, from a company whose President and Chief
Executive Officer is a member of Manhattans Board of Directors. In the opinion of management, the
rates, terms and consideration of the transaction approximated those with unrelated parties. As of
December 31, 2004, there was $1,400 outstanding relating to the purchases.
During the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company sold software and services for
approximately $400,000 and $90,000, respectively, to a company whose Chief Executive Officer is a
relative of a member of the Companys executive management team. In the opinion of management, the
rates, terms and consideration of the transaction approximated those with unrelated parties. As of
December 31, 2004, there was $90,000 outstanding and included in accounts receivable relating to
the 2004 sales.
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company purchased hardware of
approximately $75,000 and $200,000, respectively, from Alien Technology, a party in which the
Company made a $2 million investment during 2003. See Note 1 for further details on the
investment. In the opinion of management, the rates, terms and consideration of the transaction
approximated those with unrelated parties. As of December 31, 2004, there was approximately
$13,000 outstanding relating to the purchases.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, there were no related party transactions.
-47-
12. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) (Restated)
The following is a summary of the restated quarterly results of operations of the Company for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. The unaudited quarterly results have been prepared on
substantially the same basis as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The amounts have
been adjusted from previously issued quarterly results to reflect the restatement as detailed in
Note 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Statement of Income Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and hosting fees |
|
$ |
10,159 |
|
|
$ |
11,357 |
|
|
$ |
9,636 |
|
|
$ |
12,077 |
|
|
$ |
12,306 |
|
|
$ |
13,784 |
|
|
$ |
10,257 |
|
|
$ |
13,539 |
|
Services |
|
|
30,240 |
|
|
|
33,385 |
|
|
|
33,546 |
|
|
|
32,149 |
|
|
|
33,606 |
|
|
|
36,328 |
|
|
|
36,759 |
|
|
|
34,799 |
|
Hardware and other |
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
7,045 |
|
|
|
5,219 |
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
|
5,858 |
|
|
|
4,853 |
|
|
|
7,449 |
|
Recovery (allowance) relating to bankrupt
customer (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
46,097 |
|
|
|
51,045 |
|
|
|
50,227 |
|
|
|
49,445 |
|
|
|
51,293 |
|
|
|
55,970 |
|
|
|
51,869 |
|
|
|
55,787 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and hosting fees |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
Amortization of acquired developed technology |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
12,766 |
|
|
|
14,084 |
|
|
|
13,911 |
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
|
|
15,096 |
|
|
|
16,523 |
|
|
|
17,009 |
|
|
|
17,225 |
|
Cost of hardware and other |
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
6,947 |
|
|
|
6,708 |
|
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
7,251 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
8,608 |
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
8,942 |
|
|
|
8,062 |
|
|
|
9,125 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
|
|
6,888 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
In-process research and development charge and
other acquisition-related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Restructuring Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
39,654 |
|
|
|
42,813 |
|
|
|
42,527 |
|
|
|
41,326 |
|
|
|
42,947 |
|
|
|
46,045 |
|
|
|
44,970 |
|
|
|
49,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
8,232 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
9,925 |
|
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
6,439 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
8,851 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
7,439 |
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
3,297 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
3,977 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,531 |
|
|
$ |
5,990 |
|
|
$ |
5,186 |
|
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
5,719 |
|
|
$ |
6,693 |
|
|
$ |
4,715 |
|
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted net income per share |
|
|
30,446 |
|
|
|
30,688 |
|
|
|
31,208 |
|
|
|
31,341 |
|
|
|
31,349 |
|
|
|
31,403 |
|
|
|
30,786 |
|
|
|
30,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts above have been adjusted to reflect the Restatement Items for all periods
presented. The restatement resulted from an error in the method of computing our research and
development income tax credit following a small acquisition in 1998 and for not providing the
appropriate liability for sales taxes in certain states. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details on the restatement. |
|
(2) |
|
In connection with a significant customer filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code, an allowance of $4.3 million was recorded to effectively defer
revenues arising in the fourth quarter of 2001 from the significant customer, but unpaid at
the time of the bankruptcy declaration. In the fourth quarter of 2002 and the second quarter
of 2003, $2.3 million and $0.8 million of the receivable was recovered, respectively. See
Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. |
-48-
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who
certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of
Directors.
Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2004, the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the Company have concluded that, due to the material weaknesses
discussed in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on pages 17 and 18
hereof, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were not effective to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
The material weaknesses identified by management relate to revenue recognition for sales
contracts with multiple revenue elements, the accounting for sales taxes and the accounting for
income taxes.
Revenue Recognition for Sales Contracts with Multiple Revenue Elements. The Company has
historically been able to establish vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of
its professional services and customer support services and software enhancement subscriptions
(maintenance) but not for its software licenses and, therefore, typically allocates arrangement
consideration using the residual method and recognizes software license revenue upon the execution
of the software license contract, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been
met. Although various preventive controls have been in place, management believes that additional
detective controls should be established to ensure that professional services and maintenance, when
sold separately, are not being offered at prices substantially different than the established VSOE
of fair market value for those services. If substantial variations from VSOE of fair value exist,
then appropriate evidence of fair value does not exist and the Company would be required to
recognize the revenue from software license fees ratably over the service period, rather than at
the time of contract execution.
The Company does not believe that the lack of these additional controls has resulted in errors
in our revenue recognition. Based on analyses performed by management, we believe that appropriate
VSOE of fair value did exist during 2004 for professional services and maintenance. We are
improving our internal controls over monitoring VSOE of fair value as it relates to revenue
recognition beginning immediately by:
|
|
|
establishing a quarterly procedure of comparing actual professional services billing rates and
rates for maintenance renewals to managements assessment of VSOE of fair value for those
services to ensure that VSOE of fair value still exists for our consulting and maintenance
services, and |
|
|
|
|
providing additional training and documentation of our internal pricing policies to our sales,
services, and product management personnel. |
Accounting for Sales Taxes. As of December 31, 2004, the Companys controls over monitoring
the completeness and accuracy of the determination and reporting of
sales tax payable were insufficient. Specifically, the Company did not have personnel with sufficient
skills and experience to enable the Company to properly determine whether certain consulting and
maintenance services were considered taxable transactions in certain states.
Accounting for Income Taxes. As of December 31, 2004, the Companys review and approval
controls over the accounting for income taxes, including the determination and reporting of income
taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related income tax provision were
insufficient. Specifically, the Company did not have personnel with sufficient skills and
experience to enable the Company to properly consider and apply generally accepted accounting
principles for taxes, and ensure that the rationale for certain tax positions was adequately
documented and appropriately communicated. Additionally, the Company did not maintain effective
controls to
-49-
review and monitor the accuracy of the components of the income tax provision calculations and
the related deferred income taxes and income taxes payable.
These control deficiencies resulted in the restatement of the annual consolidated financial
statements for 2002, 2003 and 2004.
We have improved our internal controls over our tax function related to accounting for income
taxes and sales taxes by:
|
|
|
Increasing the Companys internal tax resources through the hiring of a Sales and Use Tax Manager; |
|
|
|
|
Retaining external tax advisors to prepare the quarterly tax provision and offer tax technical advice; |
|
|
|
|
Expanding the level of review and discussion of significant tax matters and supporting
documentation with senior finance management; and |
|
|
|
|
Reviewing, with a third-party tax expert, our sales tax systems and the criteria set for
the identification of transactions subject to sales tax liability. |
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP on managements
assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting are contained on pages 17
through 20 of this report.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There are no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Companys last fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
-50-
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) 1. Financial Statements.
The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this Form 10-K/A. See Item 8.
2. Financial Statement Schedule.
The following financial statement schedule is filed as a part of this report:
SCHEDULE II
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Charged to |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
at End of |
Classification: |
|
Period |
|
Operations |
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
Allowance for doubtful accounts
For the year ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
$ |
8,533,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,082,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,442,000 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
5,173,000 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
5,173,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,453,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,445,000 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
3,181,000 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
3,181,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,048,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,058,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,171,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the net deductions for 2002 is the write-off of approximately $1.8 million and
recovery of approximately $2.3 million relating to the significant customer. Also included is
the addition of the allowance balance of approximately $477,000 acquired as part of the
Logistics.com acquisition, which did not impact operations. Excluding these amounts, the net
deduction amount for 2002 was $2.8 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the net deductions for 2003 is the recovery of approximately $0.8 million
relating to the significant customer. Also included is a true-up of approximately $0.2
million relating to the allowance balance acquired as part of the Logistics.com acquisition,
which did not impact operations. Excluding these amounts, the net deduction amount for 2003
was $4.4 million. |
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information
is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
-51-
(b) |
|
Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or are incorporated by reference
into, this report on Form 10-K/A: |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Companys Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2003 (File
No. 000-23999), filed on November 14, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant
defining rights of the holders of common stock of the Registrant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant dated September 24, 1997 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
First Amendment to Lease between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant dated October 31, 1997 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia
general partnership, and the Registrant, dated February 27, 1998
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between Wildwood Associates and the
Registrant, dated October 24, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2000
(File No. 000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant, dated June 25, 2001 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period
ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed August 14, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Tektronix UK Limited, Manhattan Associates
Limited and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated October 21, 1999
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
* |
|
Lease (Burlington Business Center) by and between Gateway Rosewood, Inc.
and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated August 23, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
* |
|
Agreement to Build and Lease between Orchid Apartments Private Limited and
Manhattan Associates India Development Centre Private Limited, executed on
November 19, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
Lease Agreement between IGE Energy Services (UK) Limited, Manhattan
Associates Limited and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated February 1, 2005. |
-52-
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.10 |
|
|
Sub-Sublease Agreement between Scientific Research Corporation, a Georgia
corporation, and the Registrant, dated July 2, 1998 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
Sub-Sublease Agreement between The Profit Recovery Group International 1,
Inc., a Georgia corporation, and the Registrant, dated August 19, 1998
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
Standard Sublease Agreement between Life Office Management Association,
Inc. and the Registrant, dated October 20, 2000 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended
December 31, 2000 (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
Standard Sublease Agreement between Chevron USA Inc. and the Registrant,
dated November 20, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2000 (File No.
000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement with certain directors and officers of
the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2004 (File No.000-23999),
filed on August 9, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
Form of Tax Indemnification Agreement for direct and indirect shareholders
of Manhattan Associates Software, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
Summary Plan Description of the Registrants Money Purchase Plan & Trust,
effective January 1, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on
February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
Summary Plan Description of the Registrants 401(k) Plan and Trust,
effective January 1, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on
February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
First Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
Second Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys Annual
Report for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Third Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual
Report for the period ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on March 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Companys Form S-8 (File
No. 333-68968), filed on September 5, 2001). |
-53-
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.24
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Companys Annual Report for
the period ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 1,
2002). |
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Companys Form S-8 (File
No. 333-105913), filed on June 6, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
Manhattan Associates, LLC Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Peter F.
Sinisgalli, effective as of February 25, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
Separation and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Peter F. Sinisgalli, effective as of February 25, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Steve
Norton, effective as of January 24, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on
January 12, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Steve Norton, effective as of January 24, 2005 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on
January 12, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Richard M.
Haddrill, dated October 11, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.26 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 1999
(File No. 000-23999), filed on March 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Modification by and between the Registrant
and Richard M. Haddrill, effective July 19, 2001 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period ended
September 30, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed on November 14, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Second Modification by and between the
Registrant and Richard M. Haddrill, effective November 10, 2003
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report for the period ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on November 14, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Third Modification by and between the
Registrant and Richard M. Haddrill, effective February 25, 2004
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Edward K.
Quibell, effective as of April 25, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Edward K. Quibell, dated April 25, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
-54-
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.37 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Jeffrey
Mitchell, effective as of September 3, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Executive Non-Competition and Severance Agreement by and between the
Registrant and Jeffrey S. Mitchell, dated June 22, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period
ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 000-23999), filed on August 9, 2004). |
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Jeffry
Baum, effective as of October 30, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Ramesh
Srinivasan, effective as of January 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.33 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Ramesh Srinivasan, dated January 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.34 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42 |
* |
|
Separation and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Ramesh Srinivasan, dated January 25, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Eric Peters, dated
April 23, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Companys
Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999),
filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release, by and between the Registrant and Neil
Thall, dated March 26, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2002 (File
No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
Non-Competition Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Neil Thall,
dated March 26, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the
Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2002 (File No.
000-23999), filed on March 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
Form of License Agreement, Software Maintenance Agreement and Consulting
Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Companys
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
Form of Software License, Services and Maintenance Agreement (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2002, by and between the
Registrant and Logistics.com, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on January 15,
2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated April 25, 2002, to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the
Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 29, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1* |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
-55-
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1* |
|
|
Safe Harbor Compliance Statement for Forward-Looking Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Previously
filed as Exhibits to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004. |
-56-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
|
|
Date:
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
/s/ JOHN J. HUNTZ, JR.
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PETER F. SINISGALLI
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
President
and Director |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. NORTON
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
Financial
Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RICHARD M. HADDRILL
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN J. CASSIDY
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAUL R. GOODWIN
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DEEPAK RAGHAVAN
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Companys Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2003 (File
No. 000-23999), filed on November 14, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant
defining rights of the holders of common stock of the Registrant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant dated September 24, 1997 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
First Amendment to Lease between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant dated October 31, 1997 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia
general partnership, and the Registrant, dated February 27, 1998
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between Wildwood Associates and the
Registrant, dated October 24, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2000
(File No. 000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Wildwood Associates, a Georgia general
partnership, and the Registrant, dated June 25, 2001 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period
ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed August 14, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Tektronix UK Limited, Manhattan Associates
Limited and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated October 21, 1999
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
* |
|
Lease (Burlington Business Center) by and between Gateway Rosewood, Inc.
and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated August 23, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
* |
|
Agreement to Build and Lease between Orchid Apartments Private Limited and
Manhattan Associates India Development Centre Private Limited, executed on
November 19, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
Lease Agreement between IGE Energy Services (UK) Limited, Manhattan
Associates Limited and Manhattan Associates, Inc., dated February 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Sub-Sublease Agreement between Scientific Research Corporation, a Georgia
corporation, and the Registrant, dated July 2, 1998 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31,1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.11 |
|
|
Sub-Sublease Agreement between The Profit Recovery Group International 1,
Inc., a Georgia corporation, and the Registrant, dated August 19, 1998
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
Standard Sublease Agreement between Life Office Management Association,
Inc. and the Registrant, dated October 20, 2000 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended
December 31, 2000 (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
Standard Sublease Agreement between Chevron USA Inc. and the Registrant,
dated November 20, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2000 (File No.
000-23999), filed on April 2, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement with certain directors and officers of
the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2004 (File No.000-23999),
filed on August 9, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
Form of Tax Indemnification Agreement for direct and indirect shareholders
of Manhattan Associates Software, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
Summary Plan Description of the Registrants Money Purchase Plan & Trust,
effective January 1, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on
February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
Summary Plan Description of the Registrants 401(k) Plan and Trust,
effective January 1, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on
February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
First Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
Second Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys Annual
Report for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Third Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual
Report for the period ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on March 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Companys Form S-8 (File
No. 333-68968), filed on September 5, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Companys Annual Report for
the period ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 1,
2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.25 |
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the Manhattan Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Companys Form S-8 (File
No. 333-105913), filed on June 6, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
Manhattan Associates, LLC Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47095), filed on February 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Peter F.
Sinisgalli, effective as of February 25, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
Separation and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Peter F. Sinisgalli, effective as of February 25, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Steve
Norton, effective as of January 24, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on
January 12, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Steve Norton, effective as of January 24, 2005 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on
January 12, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Richard M.
Haddrill, dated October 11, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.26 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 1999
(File No. 000-23999), filed on March 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Modification by and between the Registrant
and Richard M. Haddrill, effective July 19, 2001 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period ended
September 30, 2001 (File No. 000-23999), filed on November 14, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Second Modification by and between the
Registrant and Richard M. Haddrill, effective November 10, 2003
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report for the period ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed
on November 14, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement Third Modification by and between the
Registrant and Richard M. Haddrill, effective February 25, 2004
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report
for the period ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March
15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Edward K.
Quibell, effective as of April 25, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Edward K. Quibell, dated April 25, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Jeffrey
Mitchell, effective as of September 3, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
Executive Non-Competition and Severance Agreement by and between the
Registrant and Jeffrey S. Mitchell, dated June 22, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report for the period
ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 000-23999), filed on August 9, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.39 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Jeffry
Baum, effective as of October 30, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Ramesh
Srinivasan, effective as of January 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.33 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Ramesh Srinivasan, dated January 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.34 to the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December
31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42* |
|
|
Separation and Non-Competition Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Ramesh Srinivasan, dated January 25, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Eric Peters, dated
April 23, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Companys
Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-23999),
filed on March 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release, by and between the Registrant and Neil
Thall, dated March 26, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2002 (File
No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
Non-Competition Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Neil Thall,
dated March 26, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the
Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2002 (File No.
000-23999), filed on March 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
Form of License Agreement, Software Maintenance Agreement and Consulting
Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Companys
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-47095), filed on April 2, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
Form of Software License, Services and Maintenance Agreement (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-23999), filed on March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2002, by and between the
Registrant and Logistics.com, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on January 15,
2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated April 25, 2002, to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the
Companys Form 8-K (File No. 000-23999), filed on April 29, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1* |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1* |
|
|
Safe Harbor Compliance Statement for Forward-Looking Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Previously filed as Exhibits to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
EX-23.1 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Manhattan
Associates, Inc. (the Company) listed below of our report dated March 16, 2005, except for Note
2, as to which the date is February 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Manhattan Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries, and our report dated March 16, 2005,
except for the effect of the material weaknesses described in the
seventh, eighth, and ninth paragraphs of
such report, as to which the date is February 28, 2006, with respect to the Companys revised
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Manhattan Associates, Inc. and
subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
1. |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Manhattan
Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (File No. 333-68968); |
|
2. |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Manhattan
Associates, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (File No. 333-45802); |
|
3. |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Manhattan
Associates, LLC Option Plan, Manhattan Associates, Inc. Stock
Incentive Plan and Other Stock Options (File No. 333-60635); |
|
4. |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Manhattan
Associates, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (File No. 333-105913). |
|
5. |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Manhattan
Associates, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (File No. 333-129272). |
/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 28, 2006
EX-31.3 SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION 0F THE PEO
EXHIBIT 31.3
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Peter F. Sinisgalli, Chief Executive Officer of Manhattan Associates, Inc. (the registrant),
certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of the registrant;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
Dated this
1st day of March, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter F. Sinisgalli, Chief Executive Officer |
EX-31.4 SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION OF THE PFO
EXHIBIT 31.4
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(d), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Steven R. Norton, Chief Financial Officer of Manhattan Associates, Inc. (the registrant),
certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of the registrant;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
Dated
this 1st
day of March, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven R. Norton |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Norton, Chief Financial Officer |
EX-32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND CFO
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63
(Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not
be relied on by any person for any other purpose.
The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (the Company), hereby each certify that, to the undersigneds
knowledge:
1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the twelve month period ended December 31,
2004 (the Report), which accompanies this Certification, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
Dated this 1st day of March, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter F. Sinisgalli |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter F. Sinisgalli, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven R. Norton |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Norton, Chief Financial Officer |
In accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an
accompanying document and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.